Literature DB >> 9539617

Laryngeal mask airway position and the risk of gastric insufflation.

F Latorre1, B Eberle, N Weiler, R Mienert, A Stanek, R Goedecke, W Heinrichs.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A potential risk of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is an incomplete mask seal causing gastric insufflation or oropharyngeal air leakage. The objective of the present study was to assess the incidence of LMA malpositions by fiberoptic laryngoscopy, and to determine their influence on gastric insufflation and oropharyngeal air leakage. One hundred eight patients were studied after the induction of anesthesia, before any surgical manipulations. After clinically satisfactory LMA placement, tidal volumes were increased stepwise until air entered the stomach, airway pressure exceeded 40 cm H2O, or air leakage from the mask seal prevented further increases in tidal volume. LMA position in relation to the laryngeal entrance was verified using a flexible bronchoscope. The overall incidence of LMA malpositions was 40% (43 of 108). Gastric air insufflation occurred in 19% (21 of 108), and in 90% (19 of 21) of these patients, the LMA was malpositioned. Oropharyngeal air leakage occurred in 42%, and was independent of LMA position. We conclude that clinically unrecognized LMA malposition is a significant risk factor for gastric air insufflation. IMPLICATIONS: Routine placement of laryngeal mask airways does not require laryngoscopy. In our study, fiberoptic verification of mask position revealed suboptimal placement in 40% of cases. Such malpositioning considerably increased the risk of gastric air insufflation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539617     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  Gastric rupture and laryngeal mask airway: laryngeal mask airway was not likely cause of gastric rupture.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Mick Colquhoun; Charles D Deakin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-05

2.  Positive end-expiratory pressure increases arterial oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing urological surgery using laryngeal mask airway in lithotomy position.

Authors:  Doo-Hwan Kim; Jun-Young Park; Jihion Yu; Gi-Ho Koh; Eunkyul Kim; Jai-Hyun Hwang; Young-Kug Kim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients.

Authors:  Amr M Helmy; Hossam M Atef; Ezzat M El-Taher; Ahmed Mosaad Henidak
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

4.  The effects of laryngeal mask airway passage simulation training on the acquisition of undergraduate clinical skills: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Elpiniki Laiou; Thomas H Clutton-Brock; Richard J Lilford; Celia A Taylor
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  A randomized comparison of volume- and pressure-controlled ventilation in children with the i-gel: Effects on peak inspiratory pressure, oropharyngeal leak pressure, and gastric insufflation.

Authors:  Jin Ha Park; Ji Young Kim; Kyoungun Park; Hae Keum Kil
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  The intuitive use of laryngeal airway tools by first year medical students.

Authors:  Johannes Bickenbach; Gereon Schälte; Stefan Beckers; Michael Fries; Matthias Derwall; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-22

7.  Comparison of intragastric pressure between endotracheal tube and supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic hepatectomy: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Jin Hee Ahn; Ji Seon Jeong; Se Hee Kang; Ji Eun Yeon; Eun A Cho; Gyu Sung Choi; Jong Man Kim; Gaab Soo Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.