Literature DB >> 9539593

A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of ondansetron versus droperidol as antiemetics for elective outpatient surgical procedures. S3A-409 and S3A-410 Study Groups.

J T Fortney1, T J Gan, S Graczyk, B Wetchler, T Melson, S Khalil, R McKenzie, S Parrillo, P S Glass, C Moote, D Wermeling, T V Parasuraman, B Duncan, M R Creed.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Two identical, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies enrolled 2061 adult surgical outpatients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) to compare i.v. ondansetron 4 mg with droperidol 0.625 mg and droperidol 1.25 mg for the prevention of PONV. The antiemetic drugs or placebo were administered i.v. 20 min before the induction of anesthesia with a barbiturate compound, followed by maintenance with N2O/isoflurane/enflurane. Nausea, emetic episodes, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were analyzed for the 0 to 2 h and 0 to 24 h postoperative periods. In the 0 to 2 h postoperative period, there was a complete response (no emesis or rescue antiemetic) in 46% of subjects given placebo (P < 0.05 versus antiemetic groups), in 62% given ondansetron, in 63% given droperidol 0.625 mg, and in 69% given droperidol 1.25 mg (P < 0.05 versus ondansetron). In the 0 to 24-h postoperative period, there were no significant differences in complete response between the ondansetron and droperidol 0.625 or 1.25 mg groups; all groups remained superior to placebo. The proportion of patients without nausea during the 0 to 24 h postoperative period was greater in the antiemetic groups compared with the placebo group; however, droperidol 1.25 mg was more effective than ondansetron 4 mg or droperidol 0.625 mg (43% vs 29% or 29%, respectively). Headache incidence was higher in the ondansetron group compared with either droperidol group. Patient satisfaction scores did not differ significantly among antiemetic treatment groups, although all were superior to placebo. In conclusion, all antiemetic treatment regimens were superior to placebo for the prevention of PONV in the immediate postoperative period; however, droperidol 1.25 mg was more efficacious than ondansetron during the early recovery period (0-2 h). There were no significant differences between ondansetron and either droperidol dose for emesis prevention during the 0 to 24 h postoperative period. IMPLICATIONS: More than 2000 patients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting were given either placebo, ondansetron 4 mg, or droperidol 0.625 mg or 1.25 mg i.v. before the administration of general anesthesia. After surgery, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, medication side effects, and patient satisfaction were evaluated for 24 h. Droperidol 0.625 or 1.25 mg i.v. compared favorably with ondansetron 4 mg i.v. for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after ambulatory surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539593     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  19 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous droperidol: a review of its use in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Dene Simpson; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Anthony L Kovac
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Patient satisfaction survey scores are not an appropriate metric to differentiate performance among anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Gen Li; Brendan Grant; Paul St Jacques; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Matthew S Shotwell; Jonathan P Wanderer
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 9.452

4.  Extrapyramidal symptoms following administration of oral perphenazine 4 or 8 mg: an 11-year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  John P Henao; Katherin A Peperzak; Alicia B Lichvar; Steven L Orebaugh; Susan J Skledar; Michael A Pippi; Brian A Williams
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  A L Kovac
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Prophylactic antiemetic effects in gynecologic patients receiving fentanyl IV-patient controlled analgesia: comparison of combined treatment with ondansetron and dexamethasone with metoclopramide and dexamethasone.

Authors:  Young Seok Jee; Hea-Jo Yoon; Chang-Ha Jang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-11-25

7.  The Wide-Awake Approach to Dupuytren's Disease: Fasciectomy under Local Anesthetic with Epinephrine.

Authors:  Rebecca Nelson; Amanda Higgins; Joanie Conrad; Mike Bell; Don Lalonde
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-11-10

8.  The use of droperidol decreases postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Hiroaki Mitsunari; Eri Ashikari; Kumiko Tanaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Supplemental oxygen does not reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy.

Authors:  J L Joris; N J Poth; A M Djamadar; D I Sessler; E E Hamoir; T R Defêchereux; M R Meurisse; M L Lamy
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting: focus on palonosetron.

Authors:  Neil A Muchatuta; Michael J Paech
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.