Literature DB >> 9539233

Networks of domain-specific and general regions involved in episodic memory for spatial location and object identity.

S Köhler1, M Moscovitch, G Winocur, S Houle, A R McIntosh.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to investigate human episodic memory for spatial location and object identity. We measured regional cerebral bloodflow (rCBF) while subjects engaged in perceptual matching of the location or the identity of line drawings of objects. Perceptual matching also involved incidental encoding of the presented information. Subsequently, rCBF was measured when subjects retrieved the location or the identity of these objects from memory. Using the multivariate partial least squares image analysis, we identified three patterns of activity across the brain that allowed us to distinguish structures that are differentially involved in processing spatial location and object identity from structures that are differentially involved in encoding and retrieval but operate across both domains. Domain-specificity was evident by increased rCBF during the processing of spatial location in the right middle occipital gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and superior temporal sulcus, and by increased rCBF during the processing of object identity in portions of bilateral lingual and fusiform gyri. There was a nearly complete overlap between domain-specific dorsal and ventral extrastriate cortex activations during perceptual matching and memory retrieval. Evidence of domain-specificity was also found in the prefrontal cortex and the left hippocampus, but the effect interacted with encoding and retrieval. Domain-general structures included bilateral superior temporal cortex regions, which were preferentially activated during encoding, and portions of bilateral middle and inferior frontal gyri, which were preferentially activated during retrieval. Together, our data suggest that encoding and retrieval in episodic memory depend on the interplay between domain-specific structures, most of which are involved in memory as well as perception, and domain-general structures, some of which operate more at encoding and others more at retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539233     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00098-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

1.  Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval mode.

Authors:  M Lepage; O Ghaffar; L Nyberg; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval.

Authors:  L Nyberg; R Habib; A R McIntosh; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Frontal-lobe involvement in spatial memory: evidence from PET, fMRI, and lesion studies.

Authors:  R P Kessels; A Postma; E M Wijnalda; E H de Haan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Episodic memory for object location versus episodic memory for object identity: do they rely on distinct encoding processes?

Authors:  S Köhler; M Moscovitch; B Melo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-10

Review 5.  Memory Retrieval in Mice and Men.

Authors:  Aya Ben-Yakov; Yadin Dudai; Mark R Mayford
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  "What" and "where" in the human auditory system.

Authors:  C Alain; S R Arnott; S Hevenor; S Graham; C L Grady
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An fMRI study of episodic memory: retrieval of object, spatial, and temporal information.

Authors:  Scott M Hayes; Lee Ryan; David M Schnyer; Lynn Nadel
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Implicit memory for object locations depends on reactivation of encoding-related brain regions.

Authors:  Anna Manelis; Catherine Hanson; Stephen José Hanson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Memory for pantomimed actions versus actions with real objects.

Authors:  Ava J Senkfor
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 10.  The ghosts of brain states past: remembering reactivates the brain regions engaged during encoding.

Authors:  Jared F Danker; John R Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.