Literature DB >> 9538773

Clean-catch versus urine collection pads: a prospective trial.

J Lewis1.   

Abstract

Two methods for collecting urine samples from very young children were compared in a paediatric ward of a busy district general hospital. Samples collected using urine collection pads were compared to the standard clean-catch method using sterile foil bowls. No significant differences were observed in the outcome of tests from samples collected by the two methods over the course of a short nurse-led trial, and the hospital has adopted the urine collection pad for routine paediatric UTI sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9538773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Nurs        ISSN: 0962-9513


  3 in total

1.  Urine collection pads: are samples reliable for urine biochemistry and microscopy?

Authors:  Peter I Macfarlane; Robert Ellis; Christopher Hughes; Christine Houghton; Robert Lord
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-12-28       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Urine sample collection.

Authors:  S Vernon; C K Foo; N D Plant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  An improved urine collection pad method: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  S Rao; J Bhatt; C Houghton; Peter Macfarlane
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.791

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.