Literature DB >> 9537504

Comparative molecular analysis of Na+/H+ exchangers: a unified model for Na+/H+ antiport?

P Dibrov1, L Fliegel.   

Abstract

Despite 30 years of study on Na+/H+ exchange, the molecular mechanisms of antiport remain obscure. Most challenging, the identity of amino acids involved in binding transported cations is still unknown. We review data examining the identity of residues that are involved in cation binding and translocation of prokaryotic and eukaryotic Na+/H+ antiporters. Several polar residues specifically distributed within or immediately adjacent to membrane spanning regions are implicated as being important. These key amino acids are conserved in prokaryotes and in some lower eukaryotic forms of the Na+/ H+ antiporter, despite their being dispersed throughout the protein and despite an overall low similarity in the linear sequence of these Na+/H+ antiporters. We suggest that this conservation of isolated residues (together with distances between them) reflects a general physicochemical mechanism of cation binding by exchangers. The binding could be based on coordination of the substrate cation by a crown ether-like cluster of polar atomic groups amino acids, as has been hypothesized by Boyer. Traditional screening for the extended, highly conserved linear protein sequences might not be applicable when searching for functional domains of ion transporters. Three-dimensional constellations of polar residues (3D-motifs) may be evolutionary conserved rather than linear primary sequence.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9537504     DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00119-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS Lett        ISSN: 0014-5793            Impact factor:   4.124


  20 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of a Na+/H+ antiporter gene from the halophyte Atriplex gmelini.

Authors:  A Hamada; M Shono; T Xia; M Ohta; Y Hayashi; A Tanaka; T Hayakawa
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Bacillus subtilis NhaC, an Na+/H+ antiporter, influences expression of the phoPR operon and production of alkaline phosphatases.

Authors:  Z Prágai; C Eschevins; S Bron; C R Harwood
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Structural and functional analysis of the Na+/H+ exchanger.

Authors:  Emily R Slepkov; Jan K Rainey; Brian D Sykes; Larry Fliegel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Structural and functional analysis of transmembrane XI of the NHE1 isoform of the Na+/H+ exchanger.

Authors:  Brian L Lee; Xiuju Li; Yongsheng Liu; Brian D Sykes; Larry Fliegel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Identification of conserved polar residues important for salt tolerance by the Na+/H+ exchanger of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Larry Fliegel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 6.  Functional role of polar amino acid residues in Na+/H+ exchangers.

Authors:  C A Wiebe; E R Dibattista; L Fliegel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Acidic residues of extracellular loop 3 of the Na+/H+ exchanger type 1 are important in cation transport.

Authors:  Xiuju Li; Sicheng Quan; Thomas Corsiatto; Larry Fliegel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  Functional analysis of amino acids of the Na+/H+ exchanger that are important for proton translocation.

Authors:  Christine A Wiebe; Carmen Rieder; Paul G Young; Pavel Dibrov; Larry Fliegel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.396

9.  Expression, purification, and reconstitution of the Na(+)/H (+) exchanger sod2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Heng Chen; Larry Fliegel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.396

10.  Expression and characterization of the SOS1 Arabidopsis salt tolerance protein.

Authors:  Asad Ullah; Debajyoti Dutta; Larry Fliegel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.