Literature DB >> 9537307

Obese women are less sensitive for the satiety effects of bombesin than lean women.

R J Lieverse1, A A Masclee, J B Jansen, W F Lam, C B Lamers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether infusion of bombesin, when combined with a gastric preload, influence satiety and foot intake in obese and lean healthy women.
DESIGN: Double blind, placebo controlled study.
SETTING: Department of Gastroenterology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: Obese (n = 7) and lean (n = 7) healthy women.
INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous infusion of bombesin (0.09 nmol/kg ideal weight/h) or placebo for 165 min. Gastric preload of banana slices was administered at time 60 min. Meal ingestion started at time 75 min (banana slices). Food intake was calculated and satiety was measured by visual analog scales.
RESULTS: During infusion of bombesin the amount of food eaten by the lean individuals (193+/-37 g) was significantly reduced compared to saline infusion (365+/-42 g, P < 0.05). However, bombesin induced no significant feeding suppression in obese women when compared to saline (241+/-46 vs 301+/-45 g, respectively). The decrease in food intake during bombesin infusion compared to saline was significantly greater in lean subjects (173+/-30 g) than in obese subjects (59+/-35 g; P < 0.05). Only in lean subjects subjective preprandial hunger feelings were significantly affected by bombesin infusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of bombesin, when combined with a gastric preload, inhibits food intake and increases satiety in lean women. Obese women are less sensitive for these bombesin induced satiety effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9537307     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  6 in total

1.  Bombesin improves adaptive immunity of the salivary gland during parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Joseph F Pierre; Aaron F Heneghan; Xinying Wang; Drew A Roenneburg; Guy E Groblewski; Kenneth A Kudsk
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Food fight! Parenteral nutrition, enteral stimulation and gut-derived mucosal immunity.

Authors:  Joshua L Hermsen; Yoshifumi Sano; Kenneth A Kudsk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Habituation as a determinant of human food intake.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Jennifer L Temple; James N Roemmich; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Intraduodenal administration of intact pea protein effectively reduces food intake in both lean and obese male subjects.

Authors:  Maartje C P Geraedts; Freddy J Troost; Marjet J M Munsters; Jos H C H Stegen; Rogier J de Ridder; Jose M Conchillo; Joanna W Kruimel; Ad A M Masclee; Wim H M Saris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Peptides and food intake.

Authors:  Carmen Sobrino Crespo; Aránzazu Perianes Cachero; Lilian Puebla Jiménez; Vicente Barrios; Eduardo Arilla Ferreiro
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Stress and eating: a dual role for bombesin-like peptides.

Authors:  Z Merali; S Graitson; J C Mackay; P Kent
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.