Literature DB >> 9536901

MRI of lumbar spondylosis: a comparison of sagittal T2 weighted and three sequence examinations.

J J Rankine1, C E Hutchinson, D G Hughes.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether a single T2 weighted sagittal sequence could replace the conventional three sequence examination of the lumbar spine. The T2 weighted sagittal image of 79 lumbar spine MRI examinations were retrospectively reported by three radiologists. Features relating to degenerative disease were recorded and an assessment made of whether further sequences were likely to add information. On a separate occasion the T1 weighted and T2 weighted sagittal and T2 weighted axial sequences were reported blind in relation to the initial assessment. Areas of disagreement were resolved by consensus opinion. The T2 weighted sequence was compared with the three sequences, taking the three sequence examination as the standard. Disc protrusions were diagnosed from the T2 weighted sagittal images with a sensitivity of 38% and a specificity of 97%. 22 discs reported as a disc bulge on the T2 weighted sequence were re-classified as a disc protrusion on axial images because of their focal nature. Central canal stenosis was diagnosed on the T2 weighted sagittal sequence with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 95%. After assessing the T2 weighted sequence, it was thought unlikely that further sequences would add extra information in 60% of cases (48/79). However, further information was obtained in 21% of these cases (10/48) when all the sequences were assessed. The extra information gained by using all three sequences was considered to be of greater benefit than the time saved by using a single T2 sagittal sequence. Other diagnoses where the additional sequences proved helpful are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9536901     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.70.839.9536901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  3 in total

Review 1.  Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting.

Authors:  Gustav Andreisek; Richard A Deyo; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Francois Porchet; Sebastian F X Winklhofer; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography-myelography for quantitative evaluation of lumbar intracanalar cross-section.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Ogura; Kei Miyamoto; Shoji Fukuta; Toshitaka Naganawa; Katsuji Shimizu
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Utility of limited protocol magnetic resonance imaging lumbar spine for nerve root compression in a developing country, is it accurate and cost effective?

Authors:  Kiran Hilal; Zafar Sajjad; Raza Sayani; Dawar Khan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-09-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.