Literature DB >> 9536206

'Unsafe protected sex': qualitative insights on measures of sexual risk.

A Quirk1, T Rhodes, G V Stimson.   

Abstract

To describe forms of unsafe protected sex (vaginal or anal intercourse where condoms are used unsafely) among a sample of drug users in London, data are drawn from a qualitative study of the sexual and drug taking lifestyles of opioid and stimulant users. Depth one-to-one interviews (n = 96) elicited detailed descriptions from interviewees of their sexual behaviour, including the last occasions they had protected and unprotected sex. Analysis of these accounts identified the phenomenon of 'unsafe protected sex' (UPS). Three forms of UPS were identified: (1) Condoms for ejaculation only. This is where a condom was used for penetrative sex, but only when ejaculation was imminent. In these situations, the perceived function of the condom related more to the prevention of unwanted pregnancy than the prevention of HIV/STDs. (2) Condoms after limited unprotected penetration. This is where sexual partners commenced unprotected penetration but used a condom soon after. Participants tended to see such unprotected penetration as a coerced or collaborative transgression from their usual safer sexual practices. (3) Condom failure. This is where condoms split or came off during penetration. This was sometimes only discovered after ejaculation and withdrawal, and was invariably perceived by participants to have been unsafe. The likelihood of condom failure may be increased in penetrative sex prolonged through the use of drugs. Findings point to the possibility that surveys of sexual risk behaviour underestimate levels of unprotected and unsafe sex. A broader and more sophisticated definition of 'sexual risk behaviour' is required with regard to condom use, one which incorporates UPS. If some forms of UPS are perceived to be 'safer sex', future interventions need to highlight the STD transmission risks associated with this activity. Also, some people may view UPS as a transgression towards unsafe behaviour, and this may be proffered as a rationalization for not using condoms at all.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9536206     DOI: 10.1080/713612349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Care        ISSN: 0954-0121


  5 in total

Review 1.  The application of qualitative research methods to the study of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  R Power
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Crack pipe sharing among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting.

Authors:  Tessa Cheng; Evan Wood; Paul Nguyen; Julio Montaner; Thomas Kerr; Kora DeBeck
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2014-07-25

3.  Differences in perceptions of what constitutes having "had sex" in a population of people living with HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  M Keith Rawlings; Robert J Graff; Rodrigo Calderon; Shelisa Casey-Bailey; Mary V Pasley
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Would you say you had unprotected sex if ...? Sexual health language in emails to a reproductive health website.

Authors:  L L Wynn; Angel M Foster; James Trussell
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2010-06

5.  Substance use patterns and unprotected sex among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tessa Cheng; Caitlin Johnston; Thomas Kerr; Paul Nguyen; Evan Wood; Kora DeBeck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.