Literature DB >> 9533532

Interferon-gamma and monoclonal antibody 131I-labeled CC49: outcomes in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer.

S F Slovin1, H I Scher, C R Divgi, V Reuter, G Sgouros, M Moore, K Weingard, R Pettengall, M Imbriaco, A El-Shirbiny, R Finn, J Bronstein, C Brett, D Milenic, A Dnistrian, L Shapiro, J Schlom, S M Larson.   

Abstract

To assess the tumor targeting, safety, and efficacy of monoclonal antibody 131I-labeled CC49 in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer, 16 patients received 75 mCi/m2 of the radiolabeled antibody after 7 days of IFN-gamma pretreatment. Sequential tumor biopsies in three patients showed a median 5-fold (range, 2-6-fold) increase in the proportion of cells staining positively for the TAG-72 antigen, whereas one showed a decrease in staining. Fourteen patients received 131I-labeled CC49, whereas 2 showed a disease-related decrease in performance status, precluding antibody treatment. The antibody localized to sites of metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer in 86% (12 of 14; 95% confidence interval, 57-95%) of cases. Both osseous and extraosseous sites were visualized, and in six (42%) patients, more areas were visible when the radioimmunoconjugate was used than were apparent when conventional scanning techniques were used. The localization of the conjugate in the marrow cavity was usually a site not visualized by the radionuclide bone scan, in which the isotope localizes primarily to the tumor-bone interface. The dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia because five (36%) patients showed grade IV and seven (50%) showed grade III effects. In addition, six (42%) patients, four of whom were hospitalized, showed a flare in baseline pain, and four showed a decrease in pain. No patient showed a >50% decline in prostate-specific antigen, although radionuclide bone scans remained stable in four cases for a median of 4 months. The results are consistent with dosimetry estimates showing that the delivered dose to tumor was subtherapeutic and suggest that approaches that exclusively target the bone tumor interface or the marrow stroma may be unable to completely eradicate disease in the marrow cavity. For CC49, improving outcomes would require repetitive dosing, which was precluded by the rapid development of a human antimouse antibody response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9533532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  9 in total

Review 1.  Targeting osseous metastases: rationale and development of radio-immunotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Morris; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Chaitanya Divgi; Steven Larson; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Development of oligoclonal nanobodies for targeting the tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 antigen.

Authors:  Zahra Sharifzadeh; Fatemeh Rahbarizadeh; Mohammad Ali Shokrgozar; Davoud Ahmadvand; Fereidoun Mahboudi; Fatemeh Rahimi Jamnani; Seyed Hamid Aghaee Bakhtiari
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 3.  Immunotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  B I Rini; E J Small
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Interferon-gamma reduces cell surface expression of annexin 2 and suppresses the invasive capacity of prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Claire Hastie; John R Masters; Stephen E Moss; Soren Naaby-Hansen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Immunotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence Fong; Eric J Small
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.945

Review 6.  Immunotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence Fong; Eric J Small
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 7.  Targeting osseous metastases: rationale and development of radio-immunotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Morris; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Chaitanya Divgi; Steven Larson; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 8.  [Immunomodulatory treatment approaches for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M A Reiter; J Pfitzenmaier; M Hohenfellner; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.803

9.  A phase II study of the bispecific antibody MDX-H210 (anti-HER2 x CD64) with GM-CSF in HER2+ advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  N D James; P J Atherton; J Jones; A J Howie; S Tchekmedyian; R T Curnow
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.