Literature DB >> 9533413

Limitations of the difference between clinic and daytime blood pressure as a surrogate measure of the 'white-coat' effect. Syst-Eur investigators.

G Parati1, S Omboni, J Staessen, L Thijs, R Fagard, L Ulian, G Mancia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The difference between clinic and ambulatory average daytime blood pressures is frequently taken as a surrogate measure of the 'white-coat effect' (i.e. the pressor reaction triggered in the patient by the physician's visit).
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of this difference and its relationship with clinic and average ambulatory daytime blood pressure levels. DESIGN AND METHODS: These issues were addressed with two large groups of subjects in whom both clinic and ambulatory blood pressures were measured, namely 783 outpatients with systolic and diastolic essential hypertension [Group 1, aged 50.8+/-9.4 years (mean +/- SD)], participating in standardized Italian trials of antihypertensive drugs, and 506 elderly patients (group 2, age 71+/-7 years) with isolated systolic hypertension, participating in the European Syst-Eur trial.
RESULTS: The clinic-daytime blood pressure difference for the essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients (group 1) was 13.6+/-14.3 mmHg for systolic and 9.1+/-8.6 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P always < 0.01). This difference for the elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (group 2) was 21.2+/-16.0 mmHg for systolic and only 1.3+/-10.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). In both studies little or no systematic clinic-daytime difference could be observed for heart rate. The reproducibility of the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference, tested for 108 essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients from group 1 and 128 isolated systolic hypertensives from group 2, was invariably lower than that both of daytime and of clinic blood pressure values. Finally, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference was progressively higher for increasing levels of clinic blood pressure and progressively lower for higher levels of ambulatory daytime blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference has a limited reproducibility; depends not only on clinic but also on daytime average blood pressure, which means that its size is a function of the blood pressure criteria employed for selection of the patients in a trial; and is never associated with a systematic clinic-daytime difference in heart rate, which further questions its use as a reliable surrogate measure of the true pressor response induced in the patient by the doctor's visit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9533413     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199816010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  4 in total

Review 1.  Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Isabella A Horvath; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The Impact of Measurement Methods on Office Blood Pressure and Management of Hypertension in General Practice.

Authors:  Julia Höller; Linda Elizabeth Villagomez Fuentes; Klaus Matthias; Reinhold Kreutz
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2019-11-09

3.  Clinic Blood Pressure Underestimates Ambulatory Blood Pressure in an Untreated Employer-Based US Population: Results From the Masked Hypertension Study.

Authors:  Joseph E Schwartz; Matthew M Burg; Daichi Shimbo; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone; Joji Ishikawa; Richard Sloan; Tyla Yurgel; Steven Grossman; Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  No evidence that panic attacks are associated with the white coat effect in hypertension.

Authors:  S J C Davies; P R Jackson; L E Ramsay; P Ghahramani; R L Palmer; J Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.