Literature DB >> 9532962

Effects of retention interval on latent inhibition and perceptual learning.

A S Killcross1, M J Kiernan, D Dwyer, R F Westbrook.   

Abstract

Repeated, non-reinforced preexposure to a context slowed development of conditioned freezing to that context when it was subsequently paired with footshock (latent inhibition) and enhanced discriminability of that context from a similar context (perceptual learning) whether assessed by a generalization test or by explicit discrimination training. Latent inhibition was eliminated by a delay between conditioning sessions and test (Experiments 1a and 1b) and reduced by a delay between preexposure and conditioning (Experiment 2). However, perceptual learning was unaffected by either of these intervals (Experiments 1b and 2). These results are discussed in terms their impact on theories that have latent inhibition as a possible mechanism of perceptual learning, and on theories of latent inhibition that consider the retardation of conditioned responding to be the result of an acquisition failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9532962     DOI: 10.1080/713932665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  9 in total

1.  Massive preexposure and preexposure in multiple contexts attenuate the context specificity of latent inhibition.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Raymond C Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Interaction of retention interval with CS-preexposure and extinction treatments: symmetry with respect to primacy.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Effects of preexposure and retention interval placement on latent inhibition and perceptual learning in a choice-maze discrimination task.

Authors:  L G De La Casa; William Timberlake
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Primacy effects induced by temporal or physical context shifts are attenuated by a preshift test trial.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 5.  There is a time and a place for everything: bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation.

Authors:  R E Lubow; L G De la Casa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  Delaying interference training has equivalent effects in various Pavlovian interference paradigms.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Powell; Martha Escobar; Whitney Kimble
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 7.  Stepping back from 'persistence and relapse' to see the forest: Associative interference.

Authors:  Cody W Polack; Jérémie Jozefowiez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Appetitive context conditioning proactively, but transiently, interferes with expression of counterconditioned context fear.

Authors:  Nathan M Holmes; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Familiarity-based stimulus generalization of conditioned suppression.

Authors:  Jasper Robinson; Emma J Whitt; Peter M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.478

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.