Literature DB >> 9531148

Endoscopic management of urolithiasis in the morbidly obese patient.

T A Nguyen1, J A Belis.   

Abstract

A retrospective review of 48 consecutive morbidly obese patients with urolithiasis who were treated successfully by endoscopic modalities over 3.5 years was performed. Of the 73 endoscopic procedures, 48 were ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (UL), 4 were ureteroscopic basket extraction, and 21 were percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). The patients' weight ranged from 205 to 385 lbs. (average 286 lbs.). Their abdominal girth ranged from 53 to 65 inches (average 59 inches). Twenty-six patients had one procedure, eight patients had bilateral procedures, eleven patients had two procedures, and three patients had three procedures with utilization of either multiple ureteroscopic treatments or the combination of percutaneous and ureteroscopic techniques. The stone-free rate after one procedure was 77.8% for UL and 60% for PCNL. The stone-free rate after planned repeat procedures was 97% for UL/UL and 89% for PCNL/UL. There were two minor complications. Forty-eight procedures were performed on an outpatient basis, and the remaining 25 procedures necessitated hospital admission (average 3.6 days). Morbidly obese patients with urolithiasis who are unable to have SWL because of their body weight and abdominal girth can be treated successfully with UL, ureteroscopic basket extraction, and PCNL with efficacy comparable to that in patients of normal weight and with minimal morbidity. Many renal calculi were treated with UL alone with a high success rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9531148     DOI: 10.1089/end.1998.12.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  6 in total

1.  Difficulties with access in percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Justin I Friedlander; Brian D Duty; Zeph Okeke; Arthur D Smith
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 2.  Sky is no limit for ureteroscopy: extending the indications and special circumstances.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Roberto Peschechera; Gianluigi Taverna; Giuseppe Sortino; Luca Cindolo; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Retrograde nephrostomy access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a simple and safe technique.

Authors:  Khalid M Alotaibi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  N Moosanejad; A Firouzian; S A Hashemi; M Bahari; M Fazli
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  The impact of body mass on management of patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Nicholas Tentolouris; Sotirios Charamoglis; Ioannis Anastasiou; Efraim Serafetinides; Dionisios Mitropoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Efficacy and safety of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Fatih Akbulut; Onur Kucuktopcu; Emre Kandemir; Burak Ucpinar; Faruk Ozgor; Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Burak Arslan; Akif Erbin; Fatih Yanaral; Murat Binbay; Gokhan Gurbuz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.