Literature DB >> 9530972

Human responses to propionic acid. I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics.

M Kendal-Reed1, J C Walker, W T Morgan, M LaMacchio, R W Lutz.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to fully characterize normosmic perception of stimuli expected to cause widely varying degrees of olfactory and nasal trigeminal stimulation and to directly evaluate the possible role of olfactory nerve stimulation in nasal irritation sensitivity. During each of four identical test sessions, four anosmic and 31 normosmic participants were presented with a range of concentrations extending from peri-threshold for normosmics to supra-threshold for anosmics. For each session, odor (O) and nasal irritation (NI) sensitivities were summarized in terms of the concentrations required to produce four sensation levels ('iso-response' concentrations). Within-participant variation in these iso-response concentrations was < 10-fold for 95% of normosmics, for both O and NI. For O but not NI, these apparent fluctuations in sensitivity were largely accounted for by the uncertainty surrounding the iso-response concentrations calculated for each session. Anosmics exhibited minimal within- and between-participant variation in NI and required, for all but the highest perceptual level, a higher concentration than almost all normosmics. Between-participant variation, expressed in terms of 90% confidence interval widths, was approximately 0.5 log units for both O and NI for the highest perceptual level, but increased to approximately 0.8 and 1.8 log units, respectively, for the lowest (peri-threshold) level. Our findings suggest that: (i) most apparent variation over time in O sensitivity is actually a reflection of the uncertainty surrounding estimates of sensitivity obtained for each session; (ii) within- and between-participant variation in O sensitivity is far less than is commonly reported; and (iii) low to moderate levels of NI in normosmics are the result of relatively weak trigeminal stimulation combined with much greater olfactory activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9530972     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/23.1.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  6 in total

1.  Dynamics of nasal irritation from pulsed homologous alcohols.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Kai Zhao; Charles J Wysocki
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Odorant-induced and sniff-induced activation in the cerebellum of the human.

Authors:  N Sobel; V Prabhakaran; C A Hartley; J E Desmond; Z Zhao; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli; E V Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Olfactory impairments in patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions are selective to inputs from the contralesional nostril.

Authors:  Joel D Mainland; Bradley N Johnson; Rehan Khan; Richard B Ivry; Noam Sobel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Setting occupational exposure limits in humans: contributions from the field of experimental psychology.

Authors:  Monique A M Smeets; Jan H A Kroeze; Pamela H Dalton
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 6.  Human breathing and eye blink rate responses to airborne chemicals.

Authors:  J C Walker; M Kendal-Reed; M J Utell; W S Cain
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.