Literature DB >> 9530964

Olfactory bulb output cell temporal response patterns to increasing odor concentrations in freely breathing rats.

M Chalansonnet1, M A Chaput.   

Abstract

This study compares the single-unit responses of 74 mitral/tufted cells recorded in freely breathing rats to step increases of the intensity of five odorants from 2 x 10(-4) to 10(-1) of saturated vapor pressure. It reveals a stability of the responses of these olfactory bulb output cells. Olfactory stimulation has frequently been shown to produce a strong patterning of mitral/tufted cell discharges highly correlated with respiration. In this study, cells were generally found to show the same response type to two consecutive concentrations, and only a few cells switched their response from excitation to suppression or vice versa. Their firing peak and/or trough occupied the same position in a high proportion of respiratory cycles recorded during a stimulation, and they remained significantly time-locked to the same respiratory epoch for the next higher concentration. Increasing odor concentration did not cause the mean firing frequency of individual cells during a peak to change appreciably between successive or extreme concentrations. By contrast, it tended to shift their maximum frequency during this peak towards an earlier respiratory cycle after stimulation onset. These results are compared with data reported in other electrophysiological studies and with results given by olfactory bulb models before being discussed for their implications in odor coding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9530964     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/23.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  19 in total

1.  Theta oscillation coupled spike latencies yield computational vigour in a mammalian sensory system.

Authors:  Troy W Margrie; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Relational representation in the olfactory system.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 5.  Neural computations with mammalian infochemicals.

Authors:  A Gelperin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  From molecule to mind: an integrative perspective on odor intensity.

Authors:  Joel D Mainland; Johan N Lundström; Johannes Reisert; Graeme Lowe
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Olfactory bulb coding of odors, mixtures and sniffs is a linear sum of odor time profiles.

Authors:  Priyanka Gupta; Dinu F Albeanu; Upinder S Bhalla
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Sodium concentration coding gives way to evaluative coding in cortex and amygdala.

Authors:  Brian F Sadacca; Jason T Rothwax; Donald B Katz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Coding odorant concentration through activation timing between the medial and lateral olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Zhishang Zhou; Leonardo Belluscio
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 10.  Glomerular microcircuits in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2009-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.