Literature DB >> 9530787

Biomechanical aspects of the subarachnoid space and cervical cord in healthy individuals examined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging.

C Muhle1, J Wiskirchen, D Weinert, A Falliner, F Wesner, G Brinkmann, M Heller.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In vivo flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging studies of the cervical spine were performed inside a positioning device.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the functional changes of the cervical cord and the subarachnoid space that occur during flexion and extension of the cervical spine in healthy individuals. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As an addition to static magnetic resonance imaging examinations, kinematic magnetic resonance imaging studies of the cervical spine were performed to obtain detailed information about functional aspects of the cervical cord and the subarachnoid space. The results were compared with published data of functional flexion-extension myelograms of the cervical spine.
METHODS: The cervical spines of 40 healthy individuals were examined in a whole-body magnetic resonance scanner from 50 degrees of flexion to 30 degrees of extension, using a positioning device. At nine different angle positions, sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo sequences were obtained. The images were analyzed with respect to the segmental motion, the diameter of the subarachnoid space, and the diameter of the cervical cord.
RESULTS: The segmental motion between flexion and extension was 11 degrees at C2-C3, 12 degrees at C3-C4, 15 degrees at C4-C5, 19 degrees at C5-C6, and 20 degrees at C6-C7. At flexion, a narrowing of the ventral subarachnoid space of up to 43% and a widening of the dorsal subarachnoid space of up to 89% (compared with the neutral position, 0 degrees) were observed. At extension, an increase in the diameter of the ventral subarachnoid space of up to 9% was observed, whereas the dorsal subarachnoid space was reduced to 17%. At flexion, there was a reduction in the sagittal diameter of the cervical cord of up to 14%, and, at extension, there was an increase of up to 15%, compared with the neutral position (0 degrees; these values varied depending on the cervical segment. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between flexion and extension in the diameter of the ventral and dorsal subarachnoid space and in the diameter of the cervical cord.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the results of previous studies using functional cervical myelograms, kinematic magnetic resonance imaging provides additional noninvasive data concerning the physiologic changes of the cervical subarachnoid space and the cervical cord during flexion and extension in healthy individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9530787     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  3D T2 MR Imaging-Based Measurements of the Posterior Cervical Thecal Sac in Flexion and Extension for Cervical Puncture.

Authors:  M P Bazylewicz; F Berkowitz; A Sayah
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  [Surgery of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis. Diagnostics and indication].

Authors:  B Cakir; W Käfer; H Reichel; R Schmidt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Stress analysis of the cervical spinal cord: Impact of the morphology of spinal cord segments on stress.

Authors:  Norihiro Nishida; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yasuaki Imajo; Hidenori Suzuki; Yuichiro Yoshida; Yoshihiko Kato; Daisuke Nakashima; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of C. Brembilla et al. concerning "Dynamic cervical myelopathy in young adults" by Hattou L, Morandi X, Le Reste PJ, et al: Eur Spine J 2014, 23:1515-22.

Authors:  Pierre-Louis Hénaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Dynamic cervical myelopathy in young adults.

Authors:  Lotfi Hattou; Xavier Morandi; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Raphaël Guillin; Laurent Riffaud; Pierre-Louis Hénaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Tetraparesis as clinical correlate of subacute cervical flexion myelopathy.

Authors:  Katharina S Fehre; Marc-André Weber; Cornelia Hensel; Norbert Weidner
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Kinematic analysis of the cervical cord and cervical canal by dynamic neck motion.

Authors:  Kenji Endo; Hidekazu Suzuki; Hirosuke Nishimura; Hidetoshi Tanaka; Takaaki Shishido; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-12-17

8.  Clinical evidence for cervical myelopathy due to Chiari malformation and spinal stenosis in a non-randomized group of patients with the diagnosis of fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Dan S Heffez; Ruth E Ross; Yvonne Shade-Zeldow; Konstantinos Kostas; Sagar Shah; Robert Gottschalk; Dean A Elias; Alan Shepard; Sue E Leurgans; Charity G Moore
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanical analysis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the influence of dynamic factors and morphometry of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Norihiro Nishida; Yoshihiko Kato; Yasuaki Imajo; Syunichi Kawano; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Lacrosse equipment and cervical spinal cord space during immobilization: preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Michael Higgins; Ryan T Tierney; Jeffrey B Driban; Steven Edell; Randall Watkins
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.