Literature DB >> 9530538

Behavioural toxicity of medicinal drugs. Practical consequences, incidence, management and avoidance.

J G Ramaekers1.   

Abstract

Behavioural toxicity is relatively common among medicinal drug users and evidence shows that drugs frequently produce adverse effects that prevent their users from performing everyday operations in a normal manner. Epidemiological research generally indicates that the use of sedative drugs is associated with an increased risk of becoming involved in injurious accidents. Empirical studies have also demonstrated adverse effects of sedative drugs on the performance of healthy volunteers and patients in laboratory tests designed to measure psychomotor and cognitive function, and in real life-tests measuring on-the-road driving performance. Empirical studies also indicate that behavioural toxicity can vary widely between individual drugs depending on differences in dose, dosing regimen, duration of treatment, pharmacokinetics or mechanisms of actions. Besides sedation, other CNS adverse effects such as aggression, paranoia, social withdrawal or lack of motivation may disrupt or prevent the initiation of normal performance, thus imposing a burden on the ability of the patients to function in a normal manner. Emotional disturbances are rare as indicated by the small number of case reports that mention their existence. Yet theses disturbances sometimes involve severe reactions that are more debilitating than sedation. Behavioural toxicity can be minimised by avoidance of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug interactions, adjustment of dosage regimens to a patient's individual response to a drug, nocturnal administration of drugs that are expected to produce sedation and patient education on the potential risks of the drugs they receive. Much of this information can be gained from experimental literature comparing the effect of individual drugs on performance. Unfortunately this is presently incomplete, since most research on behavioural toxicity has been confined to psychiatric drugs. Yet, in the interest of the patient, it should be the responsibility of drug manufacturers and regulators to always identify problematic drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9530538     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199818030-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  139 in total

1.  Sedative antidepressants impair visual detection mechanisms in humans.

Authors:  A Weinstein; S Wilson; J Bailey; D Nutt
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.153

2.  Antihistamine effects on actual driving performance in a standard test: a summary of Dutch experience, 1989-94.

Authors:  J F O'Hanlon; J G Ramaekers
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 3.  Drug-induced delirium. Incidence, management and prevention.

Authors:  G L Carter; A H Dawson; R Lopert
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Preclinical findings with new antipsychotic agents: what makes them atypical?

Authors:  D M Jackson; C Ryan; J Evenden; N Mohell
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1994

5.  Critical flicker fusion threshold and anticholinergic effects of chronic antidepressant treatment in remitted depressives.

Authors:  A S Hale; N R Pinninti
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.153

6.  Risk factors for injurious falls leading to hospitalization or death in a cohort of 19,500 adults.

Authors:  A Malmivaara; M Heliövaara; P Knekt; A Reunanen; A Aromaa
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Fluoxetine induced dyskinesia.

Authors:  A Mander; M McCausland; B Workman; H Flamer; N Christophidis
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.744

8.  A comparison of the central nervous system effects of haloperidol, chlorpromazine and sulpiride in normal volunteers.

Authors:  G R McClelland; S M Cooper; A J Pilgrim
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Differential effects of lorazepam and oxazepam on priming.

Authors:  H V Curran; C Gorenstein
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.659

10.  Effects of ethanol, diphenhydramine, and triazolam after a nap.

Authors:  T Roehrs; D Claiborue; M Knox; T Roth
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prescription medication usage and crash culpability in a population of injured drivers.

Authors:  Patricia Dischinger; Jingyi Li; Gordon S Smith; Shiu Ho; Kimberly Auman; Dawn Shojai
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

2.  Psychoactive substance use and the risk of motor vehicle crash injuries in southern Taiwan.

Authors:  Ching-Cheng Hou; Shou-Chien Chen; Lia-Beng Tan; Wen-Yang Chu; Chen-Mao Huang; Shyun-Yeu Liu; Kow-Tong Chen
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2012-02

3.  Outcome measures in pediatric polypharmacy research: a scoping review.

Authors:  Negar Golchin; Hannah Johnson; Paul M Bakaki; Neal Dawson; Elia M Pestana Knight; Sharon B Meropol; Rujia Liu; James A Feinstein; Shari D Bolen; Lawrence C Kleinman; Alexis Horace
Journal:  Drugs Ther Perspect       Date:  2019-07-12

4.  Effects of dexamphetamine with and without alcohol on simulated driving.

Authors:  Ries Simons; Marieke Martens; Jan Ramaekers; Arno Krul; Ineke Klöpping-Ketelaars; Gisela Skopp
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  A pooled analysis of on-the-road highway driving studies in actual traffic measuring standard deviation of lateral position (i.e., "weaving") while driving at a blood alcohol concentration of 0.5 g/L.

Authors:  S Jongen; A Vermeeren; N N J J M van der Sluiszen; M B Schumacher; E L Theunissen; K P C Kuypers; E F P M Vuurman; J G Ramaekers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Mechanistic Research for the Student or Educator (Part II of II).

Authors:  Rehana K Leak; James B Schreiber
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.988

7.  Preliminary effects of pagoclone, a partial GABA(A) agonist, on neuropsychological performance.

Authors:  Angela F Caveney; Bruno Giordani; George M Haig
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  Patient preferences for important attributes of bipolar depression treatments: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Daisy Ng-Mak; Jiat-Ling Poon; Laurie Roberts; Leah Kleinman; Dennis A Revicki; Krithika Rajagopalan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.