PURPOSE: With the advent of noninvasive neuroimaging, a plethora of digital human neuroanatomical atlases has been developed. The accuracy of these atlases is constrained by the resolution and signal-gathering powers of available imaging equipment. In an attempt to circumvent these limitations and to produce a high resolution in vivo human neuroanatomy, we investigated the usefulness of intrasubject registration for post hoc MR signal averaging. METHOD: Twenty-seven high resolution (7 x 0.78 and 20 x 1.0 mm3) T1-weighted volumes were acquired from a single subject, along with 12 double echo T2/proton density-weighted volumes. These volumes were automatically registered to a common stereotaxic space in which they were subsampled and intensity averaged. The resulting images were examined for anatomical quality and usefulness for other analytical techniques. RESULTS: The quality of the resulting image from the combination of as few as five T1 volumes was visibly enhanced. The signal-to-noise ratio was expected to increase as the root of the number of contributing scans to 5.2, n = 27. The improvement in the n = 27 average was great enough that fine anatomical details, such as thalamic subnuclei and the gray bridges between the caudate and putamen, became crisply defined. The gray/white matter boundaries were also enhanced, as was the visibility of any finer structure that was surrounded by tissue of varying T1 intensity. The T2 and proton density average images were also of higher quality than single scans, but the improvement was not as dramatic as that of the T1 volumes. CONCLUSION: Overall, the enhanced signal in the averaged images resulted in higher quality anatomical images, and the data lent themselves to several postprocessing techniques. The high quality of the enhanced images permits novel uses of the data and extends the possibilities for in vivo human neuroanatomy.
PURPOSE: With the advent of noninvasive neuroimaging, a plethora of digital human neuroanatomical atlases has been developed. The accuracy of these atlases is constrained by the resolution and signal-gathering powers of available imaging equipment. In an attempt to circumvent these limitations and to produce a high resolution in vivo human neuroanatomy, we investigated the usefulness of intrasubject registration for post hoc MR signal averaging. METHOD: Twenty-seven high resolution (7 x 0.78 and 20 x 1.0 mm3) T1-weighted volumes were acquired from a single subject, along with 12 double echo T2/proton density-weighted volumes. These volumes were automatically registered to a common stereotaxic space in which they were subsampled and intensity averaged. The resulting images were examined for anatomical quality and usefulness for other analytical techniques. RESULTS: The quality of the resulting image from the combination of as few as five T1 volumes was visibly enhanced. The signal-to-noise ratio was expected to increase as the root of the number of contributing scans to 5.2, n = 27. The improvement in the n = 27 average was great enough that fine anatomical details, such as thalamic subnuclei and the gray bridges between the caudate and putamen, became crisply defined. The gray/white matter boundaries were also enhanced, as was the visibility of any finer structure that was surrounded by tissue of varying T1 intensity. The T2 and proton density average images were also of higher quality than single scans, but the improvement was not as dramatic as that of the T1 volumes. CONCLUSION: Overall, the enhanced signal in the averaged images resulted in higher quality anatomical images, and the data lent themselves to several postprocessing techniques. The high quality of the enhanced images permits novel uses of the data and extends the possibilities for in vivo human neuroanatomy.
Authors: Alexander Hammers; Matthias J Koepp; Samantha L Free; Matthew Brett; Mark P Richardson; Claire Labbé; Vincent J Cunningham; David J Brooks; John Duncan Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Debra A Gusnard; John M Ollinger; Gordon L Shulman; C Robert Cloninger; Joseph L Price; David C Van Essen; Marcus E Raichle Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nathan B Walters; Gary F Egan; Jillian J Kril; Michael Kean; Patricia Waley; Mark Jenkinson; John D G Watson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-02-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kenichi Oishi; Susumu Mori; Pamela K Donohue; Thomas Ernst; Lynn Anderson; Steven Buchthal; Andreia Faria; Hangyi Jiang; Xin Li; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Linda Chang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michael J Crowley; Jia Wu; Rebecca E Hommer; Mikle South; Peter J Molfese; R M P Fearon; Linda C Mayes Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.253