Literature DB >> 9529488

Structured data collection improves the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

H Körner1, K Söndenaa, J A Söreide, E Andersen, A Nysted, T H Lende.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structured preoperative data collection and computer-assisted methods are claimed to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with acute abdominal pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate a possible age- and sex-related effect of using structured data collection in the preoperative diagnosis of patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
METHODS: Between 1989 and 1994, clinical and demographic data from 1764 consecutive patients were recorded. In 1990 and 1992, various detailed symptom, clinical and laboratory data were collected prospectively on a structured registration form. Age- and sex-specific diagnostic accuracy as well as perforation rate were calculated for each year.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy increased significantly by 5 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1-9) per cent when structured data registration was applied. In female patients aged between 13 and 40 years, diagnostic accuracy increased by 16 (95 per cent c.i. 8-24) per cent. Significant changes in diagnostic accuracy were not seen in other subgroups. Perforation rates remained unchanged during the entire study period.
CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, diagnostic accuracy in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis increased for all patients when structured preoperative data collection was used. However, the only subgroup with a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy was female patients aged between 13 and 40 years. Perforation rate was unaffected by structured data collection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9529488     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00627.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Bas A C M Pijnenburg; Jeroen G Lijmer; Kjell Bogaard; Roos Marnix A J de; Johannes N Keeman; Rudolf M J M Butzelaar; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The role of high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1) in the management of suspected acute appendicitis: useful diagnostic biomarker or just another blind alley?

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  A systematic review of studies comparing diagnostic clinical prediction rules with clinical judgment.

Authors:  Sharon Sanders; Jenny Doust; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.