UNLABELLED: Calculation of the glucose metabolic rate (MRGlc) in brain with PET and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) requires knowing the rate of uptake of FDG relative to glucose from plasma into metabolite pools in the tissue. The proportionality factor for this is the FDG lumped constant (LC[FDG]), the ratio of the volumes of distribution of FDG and glucose multiplied by the hexokinase phosphorylation ratio for the two hexoses, Km(Glc) x Vm(FDG)/Km(FDG) x Vm(Glc) x MRGlc equals the FDG metabolic rate (MRFDG) divided by the LC(FDG), i.e., MRGlc = MRFDG/LC(FDG) and LC(FDG) = MRFDG/MRGlc. This investigation tested the hypothesis that LC(FDG) is significantly higher in gliomas than it is in brain uninvolved with tumor. METHODS: We imaged 40 patients with malignant gliomas with 1-[11C]glucose followed by FDG. The metabolic rates MRGlc and MRFDG were estimated for glioma and contralateral brain regions of interest by an optimization program based on three-compartment, four-rate constant models for the two hexoses. RESULTS: The LC(FDG), estimated as MRFDG/MRGlc, in gliomas was 1.40 +/- 0.46 (mean +/- s.d.; range = 0.72-3.10), whereas in non-tumor-bearing contralateral brain, it was 0.86 +/- 0.14 (range = 0.61-1.21) (p < 0.001, glioma versus contralateral brain). CONCLUSION: These data strongly suggest that the glioma LC(FDG) exceeds that of contralateral brain, that quantitation of the glioma MRGlc with FDG requires knowing the LC(FDG) specific for the glioma and that the LC(FDG) of normal brain is higher than previously reported estimates of about 0.50. 2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose/PET studies in which glioma glucose metabolism is calculated by the autoradiographic approach with normal brain rate constants and LC(FDG) will overestimate glioma MRGlc, to the extent that the glioma LC(FDG) exceeds the normal brain LC(FDG). "Hot spots" visualized in FDG/PET studies of gliomas represent regions where MRGlc, LC(FDG) or their product is higher in glioma than it is in uninvolved brain tissue.
UNLABELLED: Calculation of the glucose metabolic rate (MRGlc) in brain with PET and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) requires knowing the rate of uptake of FDG relative to glucose from plasma into metabolite pools in the tissue. The proportionality factor for this is the FDG lumped constant (LC[FDG]), the ratio of the volumes of distribution of FDG and glucose multiplied by the hexokinase phosphorylation ratio for the two hexoses, Km(Glc) x Vm(FDG)/Km(FDG) x Vm(Glc) x MRGlc equals the FDG metabolic rate (MRFDG) divided by the LC(FDG), i.e., MRGlc = MRFDG/LC(FDG) and LC(FDG) = MRFDG/MRGlc. This investigation tested the hypothesis that LC(FDG) is significantly higher in gliomas than it is in brain uninvolved with tumor. METHODS: We imaged 40 patients with malignant gliomas with 1-[11C]glucose followed by FDG. The metabolic rates MRGlc and MRFDG were estimated for glioma and contralateral brain regions of interest by an optimization program based on three-compartment, four-rate constant models for the two hexoses. RESULTS: The LC(FDG), estimated as MRFDG/MRGlc, in gliomas was 1.40 +/- 0.46 (mean +/- s.d.; range = 0.72-3.10), whereas in non-tumor-bearing contralateral brain, it was 0.86 +/- 0.14 (range = 0.61-1.21) (p < 0.001, glioma versus contralateral brain). CONCLUSION: These data strongly suggest that the glioma LC(FDG) exceeds that of contralateral brain, that quantitation of the glioma MRGlc with FDG requires knowing the LC(FDG) specific for the glioma and that the LC(FDG) of normal brain is higher than previously reported estimates of about 0.50. 2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose/PET studies in which glioma glucose metabolism is calculated by the autoradiographic approach with normal brain rate constants and LC(FDG) will overestimate glioma MRGlc, to the extent that the glioma LC(FDG) exceeds the normal brain LC(FDG). "Hot spots" visualized in FDG/PET studies of gliomas represent regions where MRGlc, LC(FDG) or their product is higher in glioma than it is in uninvolved brain tissue.
Authors: William J Powers; Richard H Haas; Thuy Le; Tom O Videen; Joanne Markham; Joel S Perlmutter Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: B J Shannon; R A Dosenbach; Y Su; A G Vlassenko; L J Larson-Prior; T S Nolan; A Z Snyder; M E Raichle Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Thomas N Seyfried; Laura Shelton; Gabriel Arismendi-Morillo; Miriam Kalamian; Ahmed Elsakka; Joseph Maroon; Purna Mukherjee Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Finbarr O'Sullivan; Mark Muzi; Alexander M Spence; David M Mankoff; Janet N O'Sullivan; Niall Fitzgerald; George C Newman; Kenneth A Krohn Journal: J Am Stat Assoc Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: F O'Sullivan; J Kirrane; M Muzi; J N O'Sullivan; A M Spence; D A Mankoff; K A Krohn Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 10.048