Literature DB >> 9528977

The antagonists RU486 and ZK98299 stimulate progesterone receptor binding to deoxyribonucleic acid in vitro and in vivo, but have distinct effects on receptor conformation.

E K Gass1, S A Leonhardt, S K Nordeen, D P Edwards.   

Abstract

Three types of transfection experiments were used to detect the abilities of different classes of antagonists to stimulate binding of progesterone receptor (PR) to progesterone response elements (PRE) in intact mammalian cells. These included a promoter interference assay, in which PR binding to PREs positioned between the TATA box and the start of transcription is detected as a reduction of expression of a constitutively active reporter gene, competition of PR antagonist and glucocorticoid receptor agonist for a common glucocorticoid response element/PRE-controlled reporter construct, and activation of a chimeric receptor (PR-VP16) containing the constitutive trans-activation domain derived from the VP16 protein of herpes simplex virus. By each approach, all antagonists tested were equally effective in stimulating PR binding to PREs in the cell. This included previously designated type I (ZK98299) and type II (RU486, ZK98734, and ZK112993) 11beta-aryl substituted steroid analogs. Stimulation of PR binding to PREs in the cell by ZK98299 was of interest because this antagonist has been reported to lack the ability to stimulate PR-DNA binding in vitro by electrophoretic gel mobility shift assay compared with RU486, which promotes efficient binding of PR to PREs. To clarify the apparent discrepancy between intact cell and in vitro results with ZK98299, we altered electrophoretic gel mobility shift assay conditions to allow detection of less stable DNA complexes. Under these conditions, ZK98299 induced the formation of specific PR-PRE complexes. Further analysis of the ZK98299-induced DNA complexes revealed that they exhibited an electrophoretic mobility different from that of the complexes induced by RU486, and the off-rate of PR from DNA was faster than that of the PR bound to agonist. This suggests that ZK98299 promotes a conformational change within PR distinct from that induced by RU486. The present results are consistent with the conclusions that ZK98299 stimulates PR binding to target DNA sequences and that ZK98299 and RU486 represent two mechanistic classes of antagonists based on inducing different conformational changes in PR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9528977     DOI: 10.1210/endo.139.4.5944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrinology        ISSN: 0013-7227            Impact factor:   4.736


  11 in total

1.  Inhibiting Nuclear Phospho-Progesterone Receptor Enhances Antitumor Activity of Onapristone in Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Wei Hu; Jie Huang; Fangrong Shen; Yunjie Sun; Cristina Ivan; Sunila Pradeep; Robert Dood; Monika Haemmerle; Dahai Jiang; Lingegowda S Mangala; Kyunghee Noh; Jean M Hansen; Heather J Dalton; Rebecca A Previs; Archana S Nagaraja; Michael McGuire; Nicholas B Jennings; Russell Broaddus; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Coactivator/corepressor ratios modulate PR-mediated transcription by the selective receptor modulator RU486.

Authors:  Zheng Liu; Didier Auboeuf; Jiemin Wong; J Don Chen; Sophia Y Tsai; Ming-Jer Tsai; Bert W O'Malley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ligand-specific dynamics of the progesterone receptor in living cells and during chromatin remodeling in vitro.

Authors:  Geetha V Rayasam; Cem Elbi; Dawn A Walker; Ronald Wolford; Terace M Fletcher; Dean P Edwards; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Partial agonist activity of the progesterone receptor antagonist RU486 mediated by an amino-terminal domain coactivator and phosphorylation of serine400.

Authors:  Suzanne E Wardell; Ramesh Narayanan; Nancy L Weigel; Dean P Edwards
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-12-11

5.  Differential Regulation of Progesterone Receptor-Mediated Transcription by CDK2 and DNA-PK.

Authors:  Lindsey S Treviño; Michael J Bolt; Sandra L Grimm; Dean P Edwards; Michael A Mancini; Nancy L Weigel
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12-11

6.  Jun dimerization protein 2 functions as a progesterone receptor N-terminal domain coactivator.

Authors:  Suzanne E Wardell; Viroj Boonyaratanakornkit; James S Adelman; Ami Aronheim; Dean P Edwards
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Endometrial effects of a single early luteal dose of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914.

Authors:  Pamela Stratton; Eric D Levens; Beth Hartog; Johann Piquion; Qingxiang Wei; Maria Merino; Lynnette K Nieman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Heregulin induces transcriptional activation of the progesterone receptor by a mechanism that requires functional ErbB-2 and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Leticia Labriola; Mariana Salatino; Cecilia J Proietti; Adalí Pecci; Omar A Coso; Alberto R Kornblihtt; Eduardo H Charreau; Patricia V Elizalde
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Progesterone action in endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer.

Authors:  J Julie Kim; Takeshi Kurita; Serdar E Bulun
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 19.871

10.  Phosphorylated Progesterone Receptor Isoforms Mediate Opposing Stem Cell and Proliferative Breast Cancer Cell Fates.

Authors:  Thu H Truong; Amy R Dwyer; Caroline H Diep; Hsiangyu Hu; Kyla M Hagen; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.