PURPOSE: To compare spiral computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (SCTA) with lung ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (VQS) as the initial investigation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective randomized trial of 78 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Patients underwent either SCTA or lung VQS as their initial investigation for PE. Cross-over between groups meant that 50 patients received both examinations. The clinicians' assessment of overall clinical likelihood of PE was also collected. RESULTS: (1) It was possible to make a confident diagnosis in a significantly larger proportion of patients when SCTA was used as the initial investigation (35/39, 90%) compared with using VQS first (21/39, 54% P<0.001). The main difference between the two groups was that SCTA demonstrated lesions other than pulmonary embolism considered responsible for the patients' symptoms in 13/39 patients (33%) randomized to SCTA as the initial investigation and following a non-diagnostic VQS in 10/39 patients (25%) randomized to VQS as the initial investigation. (2) There was no difference in the prevalence or detection of PE in the two groups. SCTA demonstrated pulmonary emboli in 6/39 patients (16%) in the SCTA first group and VQS was high probability for PE in 5/39 patients (13%) in the VQS first group. SCTA detected PE in a further two patients in the VQS first group. CONCLUSION: It is proposed that, where logistically feasible, SCTA should replace VQS as the initial investigation for PE in patients with an underlying cardio-respiratory disorder.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare spiral computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (SCTA) with lung ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (VQS) as the initial investigation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective randomized trial of 78 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Patients underwent either SCTA or lung VQS as their initial investigation for PE. Cross-over between groups meant that 50 patients received both examinations. The clinicians' assessment of overall clinical likelihood of PE was also collected. RESULTS: (1) It was possible to make a confident diagnosis in a significantly larger proportion of patients when SCTA was used as the initial investigation (35/39, 90%) compared with using VQS first (21/39, 54% P<0.001). The main difference between the two groups was that SCTA demonstrated lesions other than pulmonary embolism considered responsible for the patients' symptoms in 13/39 patients (33%) randomized to SCTA as the initial investigation and following a non-diagnostic VQS in 10/39 patients (25%) randomized to VQS as the initial investigation. (2) There was no difference in the prevalence or detection of PE in the two groups. SCTA demonstrated pulmonary emboli in 6/39 patients (16%) in the SCTA first group and VQS was high probability for PE in 5/39 patients (13%) in the VQS first group. SCTA detected PE in a further two patients in the VQS first group. CONCLUSION: It is proposed that, where logistically feasible, SCTA should replace VQS as the initial investigation for PE in patients with an underlying cardio-respiratory disorder.
Authors: Joachim E Wildberger; Andreas H Mahnken; Marco Das; Axel Küttner; Michael Lell; Rolf W Günther Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-01-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: C R Krestan; N Klein; D Fleischmann; A Kaneider; C Novotny; S Kreuzer; C Riedl; E Minar; K Janata; C J Herold Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-08-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thomas Frauenfelder; Philippe Appenzeller; Christoph Karlo; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Paul Stolzmann; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Thomas Schertler Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Aamer Chughtai; Smita Patel; Jun Wei; Philip N Cascade; Ella A Kazerooni Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.071