OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the increase in frequency of cesarean section is associated with a decreased incidence of major birth trauma. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating all neonatal cases of major birth trauma from January 1989 to December 1994. Major birth trauma was defined as peripheral plexus or nerve injuries, fractures, or lacerations. The data were grouped into two mutually exclusive periods (January 1989 to December 1990 vs January 1991 to December 1994) in which a significant difference in the cesarean section rate was known. RESULTS: Of 17,957 deliveries during the period, 141 cases of birth trauma occurred. One hundred thirty-seven of the 141 medical records were available for review, and 116 were classified as having had major birth trauma and were included in the study. The overall incidence of major birth trauma was 6.5/1000 deliveries. During the two-year period (January 1989 to December 1990), 18.3% of deliveries were by cesarean section and the major birth trauma rate was 8.4/1000 deliveries. During the following 4 years, the cesarean section rate was 22.3% and the major birth trauma rate was 5.3/1000 deliveries. Significant differences in the birth trauma chi(2) = 6.12, p = 0.013) and cesarean section (chi(2) = 40.80, p < 0.001) rates were observed. Controlling for the mode of delivery lessened the association between time period and birth trauma incidence (chi(2)MH = 3.28, p = 0.07). A significant decrease in the occurrence of major birth trauma in neonates delivered by cesarean section in the later period was discovered (relative risk = 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.97). This decrease appeared to be mediated by a decrease in total lacerations between the periods (chi(2) = 11.76, p < 0.001), because the rates of other types of major birth trauma did not differ in neonates delivered by cesarean section or the vaginal route. CONCLUSIONS: With a 4% increase in rate of cesarean section at our institution, a significant decrease in the occurrence of major birth trauma was observed. This finding cannot be explained by a decreased risk of neonatal trauma in patients delivering vaginally, but rather by a decreased risk of neonatal trauma at cesarean section during the latter period.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the increase in frequency of cesarean section is associated with a decreased incidence of major birth trauma. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating all neonatal cases of major birth trauma from January 1989 to December 1994. Major birth trauma was defined as peripheral plexus or nerve injuries, fractures, or lacerations. The data were grouped into two mutually exclusive periods (January 1989 to December 1990 vs January 1991 to December 1994) in which a significant difference in the cesarean section rate was known. RESULTS: Of 17,957 deliveries during the period, 141 cases of birth trauma occurred. One hundred thirty-seven of the 141 medical records were available for review, and 116 were classified as having had major birth trauma and were included in the study. The overall incidence of major birth trauma was 6.5/1000 deliveries. During the two-year period (January 1989 to December 1990), 18.3% of deliveries were by cesarean section and the major birth trauma rate was 8.4/1000 deliveries. During the following 4 years, the cesarean section rate was 22.3% and the major birth trauma rate was 5.3/1000 deliveries. Significant differences in the birth trauma chi(2) = 6.12, p = 0.013) and cesarean section (chi(2) = 40.80, p < 0.001) rates were observed. Controlling for the mode of delivery lessened the association between time period and birth trauma incidence (chi(2)MH = 3.28, p = 0.07). A significant decrease in the occurrence of major birth trauma in neonates delivered by cesarean section in the later period was discovered (relative risk = 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.97). This decrease appeared to be mediated by a decrease in total lacerations between the periods (chi(2) = 11.76, p < 0.001), because the rates of other types of major birth trauma did not differ in neonates delivered by cesarean section or the vaginal route. CONCLUSIONS: With a 4% increase in rate of cesarean section at our institution, a significant decrease in the occurrence of major birth trauma was observed. This finding cannot be explained by a decreased risk of neonatal trauma in patients delivering vaginally, but rather by a decreased risk of neonatal trauma at cesarean section during the latter period.