PURPOSE: To examine whether the optic disc size can be measured with common ophthalmoscopic lenses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The horizontal and vertical disc diameters in 125 eyes of 65 patients were measured ophthalmoscopically using a commercial slit lamp with adjustable length of the beam and a Volk 60 diopters lens or a Volk Superfield lens. The refractive error of the subjects ranged between -7.25 D and +3.25 D (mean +/- S.D.: -0.34 +/- 1.77). Based on these measurements we calculated the optic disc area by applying a modified formula for an ellipse, where area = horizontal diameter x vertical diameter x pi/4. Additionally, we measured planimetrically the horizontal and vertical diameters of the optic disc on color stereo disc photographs after correcting the ocular and camera magnification according to Littmann's method. RESULTS: The values of the horizontal and vertical disc diameters evaluated on the photographs were by factors of 1.0 and 1.5 larger than those values measured with the Volk 60 D lens, and the Volk Superfield lens, respectively. Taking into account these constant linear correction factors, the optic disc diameters as measured by the Volk 60 D lens and the Volk Superfield lens varied by 0.11 +/- 0.09 mm (5.9 +/- 5.1%), and 0.11 +/- 0.09 mm (5.9 +/- 4.9%), respectively, from the values measured on the photographs. The error for the ophthalmoscopic measurement of the disc diameters decreased slightly with increasing disc size. With highly myopic eyes excluded, it was independent of the refractive error. CONCLUSION: For clinical purposes, the optic disc and other structures of the posterior fundus can be determined by ophthalmoscopy using a slit lamp and commonly used ophthalmoscopical lenses.
PURPOSE: To examine whether the optic disc size can be measured with common ophthalmoscopic lenses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The horizontal and vertical disc diameters in 125 eyes of 65 patients were measured ophthalmoscopically using a commercial slit lamp with adjustable length of the beam and a Volk 60 diopters lens or a Volk Superfield lens. The refractive error of the subjects ranged between -7.25 D and +3.25 D (mean +/- S.D.: -0.34 +/- 1.77). Based on these measurements we calculated the optic disc area by applying a modified formula for an ellipse, where area = horizontal diameter x vertical diameter x pi/4. Additionally, we measured planimetrically the horizontal and vertical diameters of the optic disc on color stereo disc photographs after correcting the ocular and camera magnification according to Littmann's method. RESULTS: The values of the horizontal and vertical disc diameters evaluated on the photographs were by factors of 1.0 and 1.5 larger than those values measured with the Volk 60 D lens, and the Volk Superfield lens, respectively. Taking into account these constant linear correction factors, the optic disc diameters as measured by the Volk 60 D lens and the Volk Superfield lens varied by 0.11 +/- 0.09 mm (5.9 +/- 5.1%), and 0.11 +/- 0.09 mm (5.9 +/- 4.9%), respectively, from the values measured on the photographs. The error for the ophthalmoscopic measurement of the disc diameters decreased slightly with increasing disc size. With highly myopic eyes excluded, it was independent of the refractive error. CONCLUSION: For clinical purposes, the optic disc and other structures of the posterior fundus can be determined by ophthalmoscopy using a slit lamp and commonly used ophthalmoscopical lenses.