Literature DB >> 9527402

A multicenter comparison of dialysis membranes in the treatment of acute renal failure requiring dialysis.

J Himmelfarb1, N Tolkoff Rubin, P Chandran, R A Parker, R L Wingard, R Hakim.   

Abstract

The mortality of patients with acute renal failure (ARF) remains high, and in several large studies approaches 60%. This mortality is particularly high in patients with ARF who require dialysis and has not changed substantially over several years, despite the introduction of major advances in monitoring and treatment. Increasing prevalence of comorbidities has been suggested as the major factor in this persistently high mortality. This study investigates the potential role of the dialysis membrane on patient outcome in a prospective multicenter study of 153 patients with ARF requiring dialysis. The membrane assignment was made in alternating order and was limited to membranes with low complement activation (Biocompatible [BCM]) and cellulosic, high complement activation (Bioincompatible [BICM]). Both types of membranes were low-flux membranes. Patients were dialyzed with the assigned membrane until recovery, discharge from hospital, or death. The severity of illness of each patient was assessed using the APACHE II score at the time of initiation of dialysis. A logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for the APACHE II score. The results of the study showed a statistically significant difference in survival (57% in patients on BCM, 46% in patients on BICM; P = 0.03) and in recovery of renal function (64% in patients on BICM and 43% in patients on BICM; P = 0.001). These differences were particularly marked in the patients who were nonoliguric (>400 ml/d of urine output) at initiation of the study. In the subset of patients who were nonoliguric at the start of dialysis, a larger fraction (70%) became oliguric after initiating dialysis on a BICM membrane, in contrast to 44% who were initiated on a BCM membrane (P = 0.03). It is concluded that the biocompatibility of the dialysis membrane plays a role in the outcome of patients with ARF, particularly those who are nonoliguric at the time of initiation of dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9527402     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V92257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  11 in total

Review 1.  High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Jonathan C Craig; Paul J Roderick; Francesco Locatelli; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 2.  Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Yasushi Tsujimoto; Sho Miki; Hiroki Shimada; Hiraku Tsujimoto; Hideto Yasuda; Yuki Kataoka; Tomoko Fujii
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-14

3.  Continuous renal replacement therapy: a worldwide practice survey. The beginning and ending supportive therapy for the kidney (B.E.S.T. kidney) investigators.

Authors:  Shigehiko Uchino; Rinaldo Bellomo; Hiroshi Morimatsu; Stanislao Morgera; Miet Schetz; Ian Tan; Catherine Bouman; Ettiene Macedo; Noel Gibney; Ashita Tolwani; Heleen Oudemans-van Straaten; Claudio Ronco; John A Kellum
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Management of acute renal failure in the elderly patient: a clinician's guide.

Authors:  Ching M Cheung; Arvind Ponnusamy; John G Anderton
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Renal replacement therapy in adult and pediatric intensive care : Recommendations by an expert panel from the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) with the French Society of Anesthesia Intensive Care (SFAR) French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care Emergencies (GFRUP) the French Dialysis Society (SFD).

Authors:  Christophe Vinsonneau; Emma Allain-Launay; Clarisse Blayau; Michael Darmon; Damien Ducheyron; Theophile Gaillot; Patrick M Honore; Etienne Javouhey; Thierry Krummel; Annie Lahoche; Serge Letacon; Matthieu Legrand; Mehran Monchi; Christophe Ridel; René Robert; Frederique Schortgen; Bertrand Souweine; Patrick Vaillant; Lionel Velly; David Osman; Ly Van Vong
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 6.  Issues of Acute Kidney Injury Staging and Management in Sepsis and Critical Illness: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Christian Nusshag; Markus A Weigand; Martin Zeier; Christian Morath; Thorsten Brenner
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Biocompatible hemodialysis membranes for acute renal failure.

Authors:  A Alonso; J Lau; B L Jaber
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

Review 8.  Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group.

Authors:  Rinaldo Bellomo; Claudio Ronco; John A Kellum; Ravindra L Mehta; Paul Palevsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Clinical profile and outcome of patients with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis-an experience from a haemodialysis unit in a developing country.

Authors:  Ahmed Ibrahim; Momina M Ahmed; Seman Kedir; Delayehu Bekele
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Effect of Frequent Dialysis on Renal Recovery: Results From the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study.

Authors:  Anitha Vijayan; Rowena B Delos Santos; Tingting Li; Charles W Goss; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2017-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.