S M Kerry1, J M Bland. 1. Division of General Practice and Primary Care, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When practices are randomized in a trial and observations are made on the patients to assess the relative effectiveness of the different interventions, sample size calculations need to estimate the number of practices required, not just the total number of patients. OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to introduce the methodology for appropriate sample size calculation and discuss the implications for power. METHOD: A worked example from general practice is used. DISCUSSION: Designs which randomize practices are less powerful than designs which randomize patients to intervention groups, particularly where a large number of patients is recruited from each practice. Studies which randomize few practices should be avoided if possible, as the loss of power is considerable and simple randomization may not ensure comparability of intervention groups.
BACKGROUND: When practices are randomized in a trial and observations are made on the patients to assess the relative effectiveness of the different interventions, sample size calculations need to estimate the number of practices required, not just the total number of patients. OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to introduce the methodology for appropriate sample size calculation and discuss the implications for power. METHOD: A worked example from general practice is used. DISCUSSION: Designs which randomize practices are less powerful than designs which randomize patients to intervention groups, particularly where a large number of patients is recruited from each practice. Studies which randomize few practices should be avoided if possible, as the loss of power is considerable and simple randomization may not ensure comparability of intervention groups.
Authors: Andrew C Hayward; Richard Harling; Sally Wetten; Anne M Johnson; Susan Munro; Julia Smedley; Shahed Murad; John M Watson Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-12-01
Authors: Marc Leone; Carole Bechis; Karine Baumstarck; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Jacques Albanèse; Samir Jaber; Alain Lepape; Jean-Michel Constantin; Laurent Papazian; Nicolas Bruder; Bernard Allaouchiche; Karine Bézulier; François Antonini; Julien Textoris; Claude Martin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Thomas E Love; Randall D Cebul; Douglas Einstadter; Anil K Jain; Holly Miller; C Martin Harris; Peter J Greco; Scott S Husak; Neal V Dawson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.128