Literature DB >> 9527187

Bradycardia induced by intravascular versus direct stimulation of the vagus nerve.

G W Thompson1, J M Levett, S M Miller, M R Hill, W G Meffert, R J Kolata, M F Clem, D A Murphy, J A Armour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of the parasympathetic nervous system results in slowing of the heart. We sought to determine whether cardiac vagal efferent axons can be stimulated adequately to induce bradycardia without disturbing the integrity of the thorax.
METHODS: Cardiodepressor effects elicited by direct stimulation of a vagus nerve in anesthetized dogs and pigs were compared with those generated when the same nerve was stimulated indirectly through bipolar electrodes placed in the adjacent superior vena cava.
RESULTS: The heart rate of dogs decreased by about 80% when electrical stimuli were delivered to the right thoracic vagus at the level of the thoracic outlet through bipolar electrodes placed either in the adjacent superior vena cava (intravascular method) or directly on the nerve (direct method). Maximal responses were achieved with 10-V, 5-ms, and 20-Hz stimuli. In anesthetized pigs, similar bradycardia occurred when the right cervical vagus or the right cranial thoracic vagus was stimulated either directly or indirectly through the intravascular method. Atrial dysrhythmias occurred when the stimulating electrodes were placed by either method within 1 cm of the right atrium in both animal models.
CONCLUSIONS: Controlled bradycardia can be induced during operation without the risk of generating cardiac dysrhythmias using electrical stimuli (10 V, 5 ms, and 10 to 20 Hz) delivered to the right cervical vagus nerve or the right cranial thoracic vagus nerve through adjacent intravascular electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9527187     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01351-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Endovascular neural stimulation via a novel basket electrode catheter: comparison of electrode configurations.

Authors:  M A Scherlag; B J Scherlag; W Yamanashi; P Schauerte; S Goli; W M Jackman; D Reynolds; R Lazzara
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Bezold-Jarisch reflex causing bradycardia and hypotension in a case of severe dystrophic cervical kyphotic deformity: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Soundararajan Dilip Chand Raja; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; K S Sri Vijayanand; Ajoy Prasad Shetty; Rishi Mugesh Kanna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The pig as preclinical model for laparoscopic vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  A M Wolthuis; N Stakenborg; A D'Hoore; G E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Mechanisms of bradycardia in premature infants: Aerodigestive-cardiac regulatory-rhythm interactions.

Authors:  Kathryn A Hasenstab-Kenney; Jenny Bellodas Sanchez; Varsha Prabhakar; Ivan M Lang; Reza Shaker; Sudarshan R Jadcherla
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-07

5.  Sources of off-target effects of vagus nerve stimulation using the helical clinical lead in domestic pigs.

Authors:  Evan N Nicolai; Megan L Settell; Bruce E Knudsen; Andrea L McConico; Brian A Gosink; James K Trevathan; Ian W Baumgart; Erika K Ross; Nicole A Pelot; Warren M Grill; Kenneth J Gustafson; Andrew J Shoffstall; Justin C Williams; Kip A Ludwig
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Modulation of heart rate by temporally patterned vagus nerve stimulation in the anesthetized dog.

Authors:  Paul B Yoo; Haoran Liu; Juan G Hincapie; Stephen B Ruble; Jason J Hamann; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2016-02

7.  Sensitivity Analysis of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Parameters on Acute Cardiac Autonomic Responses: Chronotropic, Inotropic and Dromotropic Effects.

Authors:  David Ojeda; Virginie Le Rolle; Hector M Romero-Ugalde; Clément Gallet; Jean-Luc Bonnet; Christine Henry; Alain Bel; Philippe Mabo; Guy Carrault; Alfredo I Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.