Literature DB >> 952596

[Attempts at a nosological classification with two standardized psychiatric rating scales (author's transl)].

U Hentschel, W Schubö, D von Zerssen.   

Abstract

Three different procedures for classification of psychiatric patients, a modified form of Q factor analysis, the classical discriminant analysis and a simple procedure based on clinical concepts, were compared empirically. On the basis of the psychopathological state rated by means of the Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Scale (IMPS) and psychopathological and somatic scales of the AMP documentation system (AMP scale), the three procedures were applied in order to reproduce the psychiatric diagnosis. The classification was made by paired comparison of the following four diagnoses: schizophrenia, paranoid form (n = 45), schizophrenia, unspecified form (n = 47), depressive psychosis (n = 44), and depressive neurosis (n = 53). The procedures were evaluated according to their crossvalidation results. The mean percentages of correct classification were the following: 83% for the modified form of Q factor analysis, 77% for the classical discriminant analysis, 73% for the simple procedure based on clinical concepts using the IMPS, and 79% for the same procedure, but using the AMP scale, all three procedures reaching about the same level of validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 952596     DOI: 10.1007/BF00365606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)


  10 in total

1.  [Studies on a diagnostic simulation model].

Authors:  S Koller; J Michaelis; E Scheidt
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  [Probabilistic allocation rules (author's transl)].

Authors:  N Victor
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  [Objectivation of psychiatric syndromes through the multifactorial analysis of the psychopathological status].

Authors:  W Mombour; G Gammel; D von Zerssen; H Heyse
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  [Diagnostic validity of psychopathology-scales (author's transl)].

Authors:  U Baumann
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1974-06-08

5.  Lineral discriminatory analysis: a patient classifying method for research and production control.

Authors:  P Hall; B Hallén; H Selander
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  [Algorithmic diagnosis].

Authors:  H J Lange
Journal:  Munch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1971-04-09

7.  [Syndromes in psychiatric illnesses. A comparative investigation with two rating scales (IMPS and AMP-scale) (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Mombour
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1974

8.  A nonlinear discriminant analysis.

Authors:  N Victor
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1971-12

9.  [On the common proceedings of a German and Swiss work group in the field of psychiatric documentation].

Authors:  J Angst; R Battegay; D Bente; F Cornu; P Dick; M P Engelmeier; H Heimann; K Heinrich; H Hippius; W Pöldinger; P Schmidlin; W Schmitt; P Weis
Journal:  Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr       Date:  1967

10.  [Psychiatric classification by means of a discriminatory application of Q factor analysis (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Schubö; U Hentschel; D v Zerssen; W Mombour
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1975-09-18
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Stability of the factor structure in the AMDP-Scale (author's transl)].

Authors:  B Sulz-Blume; K D Sulz; M von Cranach
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1979-12

2.  [Validity of the syndrome scales in the AMDP-system].

Authors:  R Gebhardt; A Pietzcker
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1983

3.  Oral cancer malnutrition impacts weight and quality of life.

Authors:  Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Jörg Handschel; Henrik Holtmann; Gertrud Krüskemper
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.