Literature DB >> 9525557

Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement.

G J Bech1, B De Bruyne, H J Bonnier, J Bartunek, W Wijns, K Peels, G R Heyndrickx, J J Koolen, N H Pijls.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the safety of deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of angiographically intermediate but functionally nonsignificant stenosis, as assessed by coronary pressure measurement and myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo).
BACKGROUND: Decision making in patients with chest pain and intermediate coronary stenosis remains difficult. In these cases it is unclear whether the risk of an intervention and the potentially subsequent restenosis outweigh the future risk of an event if the lesion remains untreated. FFRmyo is a lesion-specific functional index of epicardial stenosis severity that accurately distinguishes stenoses associated with inducible ischemia.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis and follow-up was performed in 100 consecutive patients referred to our centers for PTCA of an intermediate stenosis but in whom the planned intervention was deferred on the basis of an FFRmyo > or = 0.75.
RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 18+/-13 months (mean +/- SD, range 3 to 42), two patients died of noncardiac causes. Ninety patients remained free of any coronary events, and their average Canadian Cardiovascular Society class decreased from 2.0+/-1.2 at baseline to 0.7+/-0.9 at follow-up (p < 0.0001). A coronary event occurred in eight patients and was target-vessel related in four.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chest pain referred for PTCA of an intermediate stenosis, deferral of the intervention on the basis of an FFRmyo > or = 0.75 is safe and is associated with a much lower clinical event rate than if the procedure had been performed as initially planned in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9525557     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00050-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

Review 1.  Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  N H Pijls; B De Bruyne
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G J Bech; H Droste; N H Pijls; B De Bruyne; J J Bonnier; H R Michels; K H Peels; J J Koolen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Long term follow up after deferral of revascularisation in patients with intermediate coronary stenoses and negative dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  T Giesler; S Lamprecht; J-U Voigt; D Ropers; K Pohle; J Ludwig; F A Flachskampf; W G Daniel; U Nixdorff
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Assessing progression or regression of CAD: the role of perfusion imaging.

Authors:  K Lance Gould
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Marcus Hacker; Johannes Rieber; Rupert Schmid; Christian Lafougere; Andreas Tausig; Karl Theisen; Volker Klaus; Reinhold Tiling
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Residual angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  M Michels; H Werner; E Onderwater; W J van der Giessen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla: a comparison to fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Peter Bernhardt; Thomas Walcher; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Coronary pressure measurement based decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Kohichiro Iwasaki; Shozo Kusachi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-11

9.  How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard.

Authors:  B R G Brueren; J M ten Berg; M J Suttorp; E T Bal; J M P G Ernst; E G Mast; H W M Plokker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Adequate patient selection for coronary revascularization: an overview of current methods used in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Steven A J Chamuleau; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Martijn Meuwissen; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.