Literature DB >> 9524511

Ultrasound measurements of the newborn hip. Comparison of two methods in 657 newborns.

J Czubak1, T Kotwicki, T Ponitek, H Skrzypek.   

Abstract

We compared ultrasound measurements using the Graf and Terjesen methods in 657 newborns. The alpha angle and femoral head coverage (FHC) were analyzed. The rate of DDH was 3.9%, according to Graf and 2.9%, according to Terjesen. The spontaneous increases in alpha angle and FHC were 5 degrees and 7%, respectively, during the first 2 months. Good accordance between the two methods was shown. A few hips were normal, according to one method and were subluxated, according to the other one. The methods gave similar results, except the percentage of "immature hips" IIa (29%) and "possible dysplastic hips" (14%). This might be a sign of better specificity of the Terjesen method. Good interosberver agreement and simple classification favor use of the Terjesen method. The method of Graf is the most commonly used and gives adequate evaluation of the hip, if the method of examination and rather complicated classification are followed closely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9524511     DOI: 10.3109/17453679809002349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  7 in total

Review 1.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: What has changed in the last 20 years?

Authors:  Pavel Kotlarsky; Reuben Haber; Victor Bialik; Mark Eidelman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

2.  Morphological Development of the Hip in Normal Infants Under Six Months of Age by the Graf Ultrasound Method.

Authors:  Bing Liu; Xiaoyun Hu; Lianyong Li; Shuxi Gao
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 3.  Ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip: what have we learned?

Authors:  Jennifer Bracken; Michael Ditchfield
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-09-02

4.  Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip.

Authors:  Christian D Peterlein; Karl F Schüttler; Stefan Lakemeier; Nina Timmesfeld; Christian Görg; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  The earliest timing of ultrasound in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hips.

Authors:  Si Heng Sharon Tan; Keng Lin Wong; Andrew Kean Seng Lim; James Hoipo Hui
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2019-03-03

6.  Interobserver agreement and clinical disparity between the Graf method and femoral head coverage measurement in developmental dysplasia of the hip screening: A prospective observational study of 198 newborns.

Authors:  Wen-Chieh Chang; Kuei-Hsiang Hsu; I-Fang Lo; Kai-Hao Liao; Yu-Ping Su
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Hakan Omeroğlu
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 1.548

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.