Literature DB >> 9523913

Responses of slaughter pigs to transport and lairage sounds.

N A Geverink1, A Bühnemann, J A Van De Burgwal, E Lambooij, H J Blokhuis, V M Wiegant.   

Abstract

The behavioral and physiological responses of pigs to transport and subsequent exposure to slaughterhouse sounds were examined. Forty-one groups of four slaughter pigs were separately loaded onto a lorry and transported for 25 min. Another 43 groups were loaded onto the lorry which then remained stationary for 25 min. Following unloading pigs were moved to a race with a length of 15 m and a width of 1.5 m. Either one of the following sounds was played at 85 dB(A) for 10 min: Pigs in front of the restrainer, Machines in lairage, White Noise, or Control (no sound). Pigs exposed to the Machines and White Noise treatment spent significantly more time close to their group-mates compared with Control pigs, with pigs subjected to the Pig sound being intermediate. Transported pigs spent less time exploring the race and were less active than pigs from the stationary lorry. Heart rate was higher during transport than during the stationary period. In contrast, during unloading, the sound exposure period and the post-sound period, heart rate was lower in the transported groups. Heart rate did not significantly differ between sound treatments. Salivary cortisol concentrations were significantly higher after transport than after the stationary period and remained higher for transported pigs after the sound exposure period. Cortisol levels did not differ significantly between sound treatments. It is tentatively suggested that social support from conspecifics may protect pigs from potentially adverse effects of exposure to lairage sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9523913     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00513-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  6 in total

1.  Loading and Unloading Finishing Pigs: Effects of Bedding Types, Ramp Angle, and Bedding Moisture.

Authors:  Arlene Garcia; John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Selection based on indirect genetic effects for growth, environmental enrichment and coping style affect the immune status of pigs.

Authors:  Inonge Reimert; T Bas Rodenburg; Winanda W Ursinus; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Emotions on the loose: emotional contagion and the role of oxytocin in pigs.

Authors:  Inonge Reimert; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Bas Kemp; T Bas Rodenburg
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Regular Exposure to Cowbells Affects the Behavioral Reactivity to a Noise Stimulus in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Julia Johns; Sophie Masneuf; Antonia Patt; Edna Hillmann
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-09-29

5.  Humanely Ending the Life of Animals: Research Priorities to Identify Alternatives to Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Aline R Steiner; Shannon Axiak Flammer; Ngaio J Beausoleil; Charlotte Berg; Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger; Rebeca García Pinillos; Huw D W Golledge; Michael Marahrens; Robert Meyer; Tobias Schnitzer; Michael J Toscano; Patricia V Turner; Daniel M Weary; Thomas C Gent
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Anxiety Behavior in Pigs (Sus scrofa) Decreases Through Affiliation and May Anticipate Threat.

Authors:  Ivan Norscia; Edoardo Collarini; Giada Cordoni
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-02-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.