Literature DB >> 9523824

Propofol and ketamine only inhibit intracellular Ca2+ transients and contraction in rat ventricular myocytes at supraclinical concentrations.

N Kanaya1, P A Murray, D S Damron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cellular mechanisms that mediate the cardiodepressant effects of intravenous anesthetic agents remain undefined. The objective of this study was to elucidate the direct effects of propofol and ketamine on cardiac excitation-contraction coupling by simultaneously measuring intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and shortening in individual, field-stimulated ventricular myocytes.
METHODS: Freshly isolated rat ventricular myocytes were loaded with the Ca2+ indicator, fura-2, and placed on the stage of an inverted fluorescence microscope in a temperature-regulated bath. [Ca2+]i and myocyte shortening (video edge detection) were monitored simultaneously in individual cells that were field-stimulated at 0.3 Hz.
RESULTS: Baseline [Ca2+]i (mean +/- SEM) was 80 +/- 12 nM, and resting cell length was 112 +/- 2 microm. Field stimulation increased [Ca2+]i to 350 +/- 23 nM, and the myocytes shortened by 10% of diastolic cell length. Both intravenous anesthetic agents caused dose-dependent decreases in peak [Ca2+]i and shortening. At 300 microM, propofol prolonged time to peak concentration and time to 50% recovery for [Ca2+]i and shortening. In contrast, changes in time to peak concentration and time to 50% recovery in response to ketamine were observed only at the highest concentrations. Neither agent altered the amount of Ca2+ released from intracellular stores in response to caffeine. Propofol but not ketamine, however, caused a leftward shift in the dose-response curve to extracellular Ca2+ for shortening, with no concomitant effect on peak [Ca2+]i.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that both intravenous anesthetic agents have a direct negative inotropic effect, which is mediated by a decrease in the availability of [Ca2+]i. Propofol but not ketamine may also alter sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ handling and increase myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity. The effects of propofol and ketamine are primarily apparent at supraclinical concentrations, however.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9523824     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199803000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

1.  The differential effect of propofol on contractility of isolated myocardial trabeculae of rat and guinea-pig.

Authors:  J van Klarenbosch; G J Stienen; W de Ruijter; G J Scheffer; J J de Lange
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Effects of L-type Ca2+ channel modulation on direct myocardial effects of diazepam and midazolam in adult rat ventricular myocytes.

Authors:  Noriaki Kanaya; Paul A Murray; Derek S Damron
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  L-Carnitine rescues ketamine-induced attenuated heart rate and MAPK (ERK) activity in zebrafish embryos.

Authors:  Jyotshnabala Kanungo; Elvis Cuevas; Syed F Ali; Merle G Paule
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  Acetyl L-carnitine targets adenosine triphosphate synthase in protecting zebrafish embryos from toxicities induced by verapamil and ketamine: An in vivo assessment.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Melanie Dumas; Bonnie L Robinson; Syed F Ali; Merle G Paule; Qiang Gu; Jyotshna Kanungo
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.446

5.  Effects of propofol on beta-adrenoceptor-mediated signal transduction in cardiac muscle; role of cAMP.

Authors:  Chul Ho Chang; Go Un Roh; Wyun Kon Park
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-04-28

6.  Stereoselective ketamine effect on cardiac output: a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jasper Kamp; Monique van Velzen; Leon Aarts; Marieke Niesters; Albert Dahan; Erik Olofsen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Interaction of G-protein βγ complex with chromatin modulates GPCR-dependent gene regulation.

Authors:  Anushree Bhatnagar; Hamiyet Unal; Rajaganapathi Jagannathan; Suma Kaveti; Zhong-Hui Duan; Sandro Yong; Amit Vasanji; Michael Kinter; Russell Desnoyer; Sadashiva S Karnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.