G C Allen1, M G Larach, A R Kunselman. 1. The North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry, Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey 17033-0850, USA. gallen@psghs.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The caffeine-halothane contracture test (CHCT) is the only recognized laboratory test to diagnose malignant hyperthermia (MH). The authors report the results of their analysis of pooled data from the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry database to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the CHCT. METHODS: The MH Clinical Grading Scale was used to identify 32 case subjects who were "almost certain" to be MH susceptible based on clinical criteria alone. Their CHCT results were compared with those of a group of 120 control subjects considered to be at low risk for MH. Diagnostic thresholds of the CHCT were adjusted, and its component tests were combined to generate receiver operating characteristic curves. The maximal Youden index for each component test was chosen as the diagnostic threshold indicative of MH susceptibility. RESULTS: The highest sensitivity (97%; 95% CI, 84-100%) was achieved with a two-component test with thresholds of > or = 0.5 g contracture for 3% halothane, > or = 0.3 g contracture at 2 mM caffeine, or both, considered positive for MH. The test specificity was 78% (95% CI, 69-85%). The addition of other CHCT component tests did not improve CHCT sensitivity or specificity. CONCLUSION: The CHCT achieves high sensitivity and acceptable specificity as a clinical laboratory diagnostic test when it is performed according to published standards. However, it cannot be used as a screening test because of the low prevalence of MH in the general population.
BACKGROUND: The caffeine-halothanecontracture test (CHCT) is the only recognized laboratory test to diagnose malignant hyperthermia (MH). The authors report the results of their analysis of pooled data from the North American Malignant Hyperthermia Registry database to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the CHCT. METHODS: The MH Clinical Grading Scale was used to identify 32 case subjects who were "almost certain" to be MH susceptible based on clinical criteria alone. Their CHCT results were compared with those of a group of 120 control subjects considered to be at low risk for MH. Diagnostic thresholds of the CHCT were adjusted, and its component tests were combined to generate receiver operating characteristic curves. The maximal Youden index for each component test was chosen as the diagnostic threshold indicative of MH susceptibility. RESULTS: The highest sensitivity (97%; 95% CI, 84-100%) was achieved with a two-component test with thresholds of > or = 0.5 g contracture for 3% halothane, > or = 0.3 g contracture at 2 mM caffeine, or both, considered positive for MH. The test specificity was 78% (95% CI, 69-85%). The addition of other CHCT component tests did not improve CHCT sensitivity or specificity. CONCLUSION: The CHCT achieves high sensitivity and acceptable specificity as a clinical laboratory diagnostic test when it is performed according to published standards. However, it cannot be used as a screening test because of the low prevalence of MH in the general population.
Authors: F Altamirano; S Riazi; C A Ibarra Moreno; N Kraeva; A Uryash; P D Allen; J A Adams; J R Lopez Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Georgirene D Vladutiu; Paul J Isackson; Kenneth Kaufman; John B Harley; Beth Cobb; Lisa Christopher-Stine; Robert L Wortmann Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Yuri Hosokawa; Douglas J Casa; Henry Rosenberg; John F Capacchione; Emmanuel Sagui; Sheila Riazi; Luke N Belval; Patricia A Deuster; John F Jardine; Stavros A Kavouras; Elaine C Lee; Kevin C Miller; Sheila M Muldoon; Francis G O'Connor; Scott R Sailor; Nyamkhishig Sambuughin; Rebecca L Stearns; William M Adams; Robert A Huggins; Lesley W Vandermark Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Carlos A Ibarra Moreno; Natalia Kraeva; Elena Zvaritch; Lourdes Figueroa; Eduardo Rios; Leslie Biesecker; Filip Van Petegem; Philip M Hopkins; Sheila Riazi Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: John F Capacchione; Matthew C Radimer; Jeffrey S Sagel; Gregory P Kraus; Nyamkhishig Sambuughin; Sheila M Muldoon Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Barbara W Brandom; Saiid Bina; Cynthia A Wong; Tarina Wallace; Mihaela Visoiu; Paul J Isackson; Georgirene D Vladutiu; Nyamkhishig Sambuughin; Sheila M Muldoon Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 5.108