Literature DB >> 9521808

Fimbria-fornix vs selective hippocampal lesions in rats: effects on locomotor activity and spatial learning and memory.

J C Cassel1, S Cassel, R Galani, C Kelche, B Will, L Jarrard.   

Abstract

The behavioral effects of interrupting the axons that pass in the fimbria and dorsal fornix were compared with the effects of selective removal of the cells that comprise the hippocampus with ibotenic acid. Starting 4.5 months after surgery, lesioned and control rats were (i) trained in both the Morris water maze and the eight-arm radial maze using protocols that placed an emphasis on either working memory (WM) or reference memory (RM) and (ii) tested for locomotor activity in the home cage. In comparison to sham-operated rats, the rats from both lesion groups were impaired in most learning/memory tasks, but there were some interesting differences between the two lesioned groups. When compared to rats with fimbria-fornix lesions (FIFX rats), hippocampal rats (HIPP rats) were slower in learning to swim to a visible platform and showed a greater impairment than FIFX rats in the radial-maze task when the testing procedure required the utilization of RM and WM in a more demanding WM task. In the test of locomotor activity, FIFX and control rats did not differ, but HIPP rats were more active than the rats in both other groups. The pattern of results obtained after a 4.5-month recovery period support the following general conclusions. (1) While there are some similarities in the effects on behavior of interrupting the axons in the fimbria-fornix compared to removing the hippocampus, there are some important differences. (2) From the findings that are available, a possible explanation to account for the difference between FIFX and HIPP rats is that the 4.5-month survival time permitted some recovery in the group of rats with FIFX lesions. (3) While it is well known that the Morris water maze and the radial-arm maze tasks provide useful measures of spatial learning and memory processes, our results suggest that the information provided by the two spatial learning tasks may differ in important respects. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9521808     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.1997.3807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  15 in total

1.  Physiological functions of the small GTPase Arf6 in the nervous system.

Authors:  Masahiro Akiyama; Yasunori Kanaho
Journal:  Small GTPases       Date:  2015-08-20

2.  Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus.

Authors:  R E Clark; S M Zola; L R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Using fos imaging in the rat to reveal the anatomical extent of the disruptive effects of fornix lesions.

Authors:  S D Vann; M W Brown; J T Erichsen; J P Aggleton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Lidocaine injections targeting CA3 hippocampus impair long-term spatial memory and prevent learning-induced mossy fiber remodeling.

Authors:  Matthew R Holahan; Aryeh Routtenberg
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 5.  The mammillary bodies and memory: more than a hippocampal relay.

Authors:  Seralynne D Vann; Andrew J D Nelson
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Glucose injections into the dorsal hippocampus or dorsolateral striatum of rats prior to T-maze training: modulation of learning rates and strategy selection.

Authors:  Clinton E Canal; Sonja J Stutz; Paul E Gold
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Prefrontal cortex and hippocampus subserve different components of working memory in rats.

Authors:  Taejib Yoon; Jeffrey Okada; Min W Jung; Jeansok J Kim
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Hippocampal dendritic spines modifications induced by perinatal asphyxia.

Authors:  G E Saraceno; R Castilla; G E Barreto; J Gonzalez; R A Kölliker-Frers; F Capani
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 9.  Hippocampal-anterior thalamic pathways for memory: uncovering a network of direct and indirect actions.

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Shane M O'Mara; Seralynne D Vann; Nick F Wright; Marian Tsanov; Jonathan T Erichsen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Behavioral destabilization induced by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine.

Authors:  Katsunori Kobayashi; Yumiko Ikeda; Hidenori Suzuki
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.