Literature DB >> 9521726

Structure/function relationships of a G-protein coupling pocket formed by the third intracellular loop of the m5 muscarinic receptor.

E S Burstein1, T A Spalding, M R Brann.   

Abstract

Using random saturation mutagenesis, we have previously identified the amino acids K439, A440, and A441 in the C-terminus of the third intracellular loop (Ci3) of the m5 muscarinic receptor as being critical for G-protein coupling [Burstein, E. S., Spalding, T. A., Hill-Eubanks, D., and Brann, M. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3141-3146]. In the present study, we have constructed a series of point mutants at each of these residues and characterized their functional phenotypes in order to define the structure/function relationships of each of these residues for G-protein coupling. Although a wide variety of substitutions were tolerated at K439, most caused significant increases in the EC50 of carbachol and decreases in the maximum response (Rmax). Only other basic residues were well tolerated (<10-fold increase in EC50, >70% of wild type). Acidic substitutions had the largest effects, reducing Rmax to under 20% of wild type. At A440, only the conservative substitution threonine was well tolerated. Substitutions by hydrophobic, polar, and basic residues caused 10-80-fold increases in EC50 values and in many cases also significantly reduced Rmax (<70% of wild type). In contrast, at A441 mutations selectively affected EC50 but not Rmax values. Previously we identified I216, Y217, T220, and R223 as the residues in the N-terminus of the i3 loop of m5 (Ni3) that are critical for G-protein coupling [Burstein, E. S., Spalding, T. S., and Brann, M. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2882-2885]. To investigate whether there were additive contributions of Ni3 and Ci3 to G-protein coupling, the functional responses of two double mutants, R223E/K439E and Y217S/A441T, were evaluated. Though these mutations were tolerated individually, both double mutant receptors produced almost indetectable responses. Little or no changes in expression levels or ligand binding properties were detected, suggesting the observed effects were caused primarily by changes receptor/G-protein coupling. We conclude that K439 participates in G-protein activation through an ionic mechanism, that A440 fulfills a structural role forming part of the G-protein coupling pocket, and that A441 contributes to receptor affinity for G-proteins. We propose that the third intracellular loop forms a G-protein coupling pocket comprised of a positively charged "lip" and a hydrophobic core.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9521726     DOI: 10.1021/bi972132j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  6 in total

Review 1.  The muscarinic M(5) receptor: a silent or emerging subtype?

Authors:  R M Eglen; S R Nahorski
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype expression in avian vestibular hair cells, nerve terminals and ganglion cells.

Authors:  G Q Li; G A Kevetter; R B Leonard; D J Prusak; T G Wood; M J Correia
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Discovery of Melanocortin Ligands via a Double Simultaneous Substitution Strategy Based on the Ac-His-dPhe-Arg-Trp-NH2 Template.

Authors:  Aleksandar Todorovic; Cody J Lensing; Jerry Ryan Holder; Joseph W Scott; Nicholas B Sorensen; Carrie Haskell-Luevano
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  Structural determinants for G-protein activation and specificity in the third intracellular loop of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.

Authors:  Maren Claus; Susanne Neumann; Gunnar Kleinau; Gerd Krause; Ralf Paschke
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  The cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain 3 regulates the activity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G-protein-coupled alpha-factor receptor.

Authors:  William Parrish; Markus Eilers; Weiwen Ying; James B Konopka
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Structural aspects of luteinizing hormone receptor: information from molecular modeling and mutagenesis.

Authors:  Francesca Fanelli; David Puett
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.633

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.