Literature DB >> 9520972

Effects of energy-matched pulsed and continuous ultrasound on tumor growth in mice.

L Sicard-Rosenbaum1, J V Danoff, J A Guthrie, M A Eckhaus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: A diagnosis of cancer is a contraindication for the use of therapeutic ultrasound (US). Continuous US applied to murine tumors has resulted in larger and heavier tumors compared with controls. We compared tumor growth using low-power continuous US and energy-matched pulsed US.
SUBJECTS: Female C57BL/6 mice (N = 174) were used.
METHODS: Animals received subcutaneous injections of methylcholanthrene tumor cells. The mice were randomly divided into three groups: 60 mice that received low-power continuous US for 5 minutes at 0.75 W/cm2 (LC US group), 63 mice that received pulsed US for 12.5 minutes at 1.5 W/cm2 (pulsed US group), and 51 mice that served as a control group. The LC and pulsed US groups received equal US energy. Both experimental groups received 10 treatments of 3-MHz US, which was applied directly over the tumor. The control group received identical handling but no US. After treatment, the tumors were excised, weighed, and measured. A one-way analysis of variance, followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc testing, was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: Mean tumor weights (in grams) and volumes (in cubic millimeters) were 0.563 g and 564 mm3 for the LC US group, 0.560 g and 525 mm3 for the pulsed US group, and 0.516 g and 406 mm3 for the control group. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Reducing total US energy will result in less growth of murine tumors. When infusing equal energy, continuous and pulsed US will produce similar effects on tumor growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9520972     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.3.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Focused Review of Safety Considerations in Cancer Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Susan Maltser; Adrian Cristian; Julie K Silver; G Stephen Morris; Nicole L Stout
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 11. Lymphedema.

Authors:  S R Harris; M R Hugi; I A Olivotto; M Levine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The disruption of murine tumor neovasculature by low-intensity ultrasound-comparison between 1- and 3-MHz sonication frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Ralph M Bunte; Heather E Price; Margaret S Deitz; Jeff H Tsai; William M-F Lee; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  Safety, Precautions, and Modalities in Cancer Rehabilitation: an Updated Review.

Authors:  Jasmine Y Zheng; Alyssa C Mixon; Mitra D McLarney
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2021-06-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.