Literature DB >> 9520812

Should a laparoscopic appendectomy be done?

H Fallahzadeh1.   

Abstract

For a laparoscopic appendectomy to be part of a surgical armamentarium, it should: 1) decrease hospital stay, 2) lessen narcotic requirement, 3) speed return to normal activity, 4) be cost effective, and 5) have fewer complications. To this end, we reviewed 60 consecutive cases of each appendectomy performed, laparoscopically and by open technique, during the period of 1993-1996. We looked not only at the above criteria, but also at the type of employment. Laparoscopic appendectomy did not decrease hospital stay (2.1 versus 1.4 days), or morphine equivalent narcotic requirement (38.5 mg versus 19.8 mg). However, laparoscopic appendectomy did carry a hospital bill of $3650.00 more than the open technique ($7923 versus $4273). This results not only from chargeable disposable items, but also from an increase in operative time (47 vs. 36 minutes) and room and anesthesia time (88 vs. 63 minutes), because of the increased length of preparation time. In only one category, patients involved in heavy manual activity (17 patients), the return to normal activity decreased by 1 week. There was no difference in complication rate in each category. Based on these findings, laparoscopic appendectomy cannot be recommended in suspected cases of appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9520812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Hospital bill in open and laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Andrea Cariati; Roberto Masini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Single Incision Laparoscopic Assisted Appendectomy: Experience of 82 Cases.

Authors:  Abhay Kumar; Anant Narayan Sinha; Desh Deepak; N K Pandey
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

3.  Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector.

Authors:  Cláudio Bresciani; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Angelita Habr-Gama; Carlos Eduardo Jacob; Alberto Ozaki; Carlos Batagello; Igor Proscurshim; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy with intracorporal laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy.

Authors:  T Nicholson; V Tiruchelvam
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Risk factors of converting to laparotomy in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Abe; Takashi Nagaie; Mitsuhiro Miyazaki; Miho Ochi; Tatsuro Fukuya; Kiyoshi Kajiyama
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-04

7.  Laparoscopic appendectomy with hand-made loop.

Authors:  Burhan Mayir; Tuna Bilecik; Cemal Ozben Ensari; Mehmet Tahir Oruc
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 1.195

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.