Literature DB >> 9520428

Populations can persist in an environment consisting of sink habitats only.

V A Jansen1, J Yoshimura.   

Abstract

Populations that live in environments with different habitats have to distribute their offspring over these habitats. When population densities go to equilibrium, the evolutionary optimum is an ideal free distribution. Under an ideal free distribution, no offspring should be put into sink habitats. However, when the environmental conditions in a habitat are not constant but fluctuate, allocating offspring to sink habitats can increase the long term growth rate of a population. We demonstrate this principle in a simple model for offspring allocation. As a consequence, it is possible that populations persist in environments that only consist of sink habitats.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9520428      PMCID: PMC19898          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Coevolution of patch selection strategies of predator and prey and the consequences for ecological stability.

Authors:  M van Baalen; M W Sabelis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Sources and sinks in population biology.

Authors:  P C Dias
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers.

Authors:  P J den Boer
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.774

  3 in total
  17 in total

1.  Interactive effects of temporal correlations, spatial heterogeneity and dispersal on population persistence.

Authors:  Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Protected polymorphisms and evolutionary stability of patch-selection strategies in stochastic environments.

Authors:  Steven N Evans; Alexandru Hening; Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Persistence in fluctuating environments for interacting structured populations.

Authors:  Gregory Roth; Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 4.  Paradoxical persistence through mixed-system dynamics: towards a unified perspective of reversal behaviours in evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Paul David Williams; Alan Hastings
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Steven N Evans; Peter L Ralph; Sebastian J Schreiber; Arnab Sen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Herpes viruses hedge their bets.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf; Zoe Laidlaw; Vincent A A Jansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Scale-dependent portfolio effects explain growth inflation and volatility reduction in landscape demography.

Authors:  Cang Hui; Gordon A Fox; Jessica Gurevitch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments: the density-dependent case.

Authors:  Alexandru Hening; Dang H Nguyen; George Yin
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Global stability of an age-structured population model on several temporally variable patches.

Authors:  Vladimir Kozlov; Sonja Radosavljevic; Vladimir Tkachev; Uno Wennergren
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 10.  Does Cancer Biology Rely on Parrondo's Principles?

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Capp; Aurora M Nedelcu; Antoine M Dujon; Benjamin Roche; Francesco Catania; Beata Ujvari; Catherine Alix-Panabières; Frédéric Thomas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.