Literature DB >> 9519324

Right atrial free wall conduction velocity and degree of anisotropy in patients with stable sinus rhythm studied during open heart surgery.

A Hansson1, M Holm, P Blomström, R Johansson, C Lührs, J Brandt, S B Olsson.   

Abstract

AIMS: Although the perpetuation of several supraventricular arrhythmias is critically dependent upon intra-atrial conduction, the literature lacks detailed information on normal values of conduction velocity and degree of anisotropy. In order to explore these factors further, we have measured conduction velocities at the right atrial free wall during sinus rhythm and during atrial pacing in four directions parallel and perpendicular to the atrioventricular groove in patients with normal atria and stable sinus rhythm. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Using a Bard Cardiac Mapping System, atrial ECGs were recorded using a 3 x 4 cm electrode array with 56 equally spaced bipolar electrodes in 12 patients undergoing open heart surgery due to ischaemic heart disease or Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome. A bipolar pen probe connected to a Medtronic 5328 stimulator was used for pacing at a 10% higher rate than sinus rhythm. The local activation times were manually set and isochronal activation maps were created for each recording. The conduction velocities were calculated from the activation maps over a distance ranging from 2.2 to 4.2 cm. The majority of the activation maps showed no signs of anisotropy; the others had less than 15% spatial inhomogeneity of conduction. Mean conduction velocity, calculated from five consecutive beats, was 88 +/- 9 cm.s-1 (mean +/- SD), ranging between 68 +/- 4 and 103 +/- 3 cm.s-1 during sinus rhythm. Mean conduction velocity during atrial pacing was 81 +/- 16 cm.s-1 at a propagation direction of 0 degree, 74 +/- 14 cm.s-1 at a 90 degrees direction, 79 +/- 12 cm.s-1 at 180 degrees and 78 +/- 20 cm.s-1 at 270 degrees, where 0 degree was parallel to the atrioventricular groove in the cranial direction and the angle increased counter-clockwise. Mean conduction velocity during sinus rhythm was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than during atrial pacing at the 90 degrees and 180 degrees directions but not compared to atrial pacing at 0 degree or 270 degrees. There was no significant difference in mean conduction velocity in different directions during atrial pacing.
CONCLUSION: Although anisotropy was documented during conduction velocity in individual cases, conduction velocity was not dependent on propagation direction at the epicardial right atrial free wall in patients with stable sinus rhythm. These findings do not exclude the presence of internodal preferential pathways as these are located sub-epicardially and a marked transmural discordance in activation has previously been documented in the vicinity of such pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519324     DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  19 in total

Review 1.  Computational modeling of the human atrial anatomy and electrophysiology.

Authors:  Olaf Dössel; Martin W Krueger; Frank M Weber; Mathias Wilhelms; Gunnar Seemann
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A novel catheter-guidance algorithm for localization of atrial fibrillation rotor and focal sources.

Authors:  Anthony J Salmin; Prasanth Ganesan; Kristina E Shillieto; Elizabeth M Cherry; David T Huang; Arkady M Pertsov; Behnaz Ghoraani
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

3.  Association of Left Atrial Local Conduction Velocity With Late Gadolinium Enhancement on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kotaro Fukumoto; Mohammadali Habibi; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Sohail Zahid; Irfan M Khurram; Stefan L Zimmerman; Vadim Zipunnikov; David Spragg; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Natalia Trayanova; Gordon F Tomaselli; John Rickard; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-03

4.  Simulation of biatrial conduction via different pathways during sinus rhythm with a detailed human atrial model.

Authors:  Dong-dong Deng; Ying-lan Gong; Guo-fa Shou; Pei-feng Jiao; Heng-gui Zhang; Xue-song Ye; Ling Xia
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Populations of in silico myocytes and tissues reveal synergy of multiatrial-predominant K+ -current block in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Haibo Ni; Alex Fogli Iseppe; Wayne R Giles; Sanjiv M Narayan; Henggui Zhang; Andrew G Edwards; Stefano Morotti; Eleonora Grandi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Mechanistic inquiry into the role of tissue remodeling in fibrotic lesions in human atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kathleen S McDowell; Fijoy Vadakkumpadan; Robert Blake; Joshua Blauer; Gernot Plank; Rob S Macleod; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Optical mapping of the isolated coronary-perfused human sinus node.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Alexey V Glukhov; Roger Chang; Geran Kostecki; Hyuliya Aferol; William J Hucker; Joseph P Wuskell; Leslie M Loew; Richard B Schuessler; Nader Moazami; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Properties of two human atrial cell models in tissue: restitution, memory, propagation, and reentry.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cherry; Steven J Evans
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 9.  Comprehensive evaluation of electrophysiological and 3D structural features of human atrial myocardium with insights on atrial fibrillation maintenance mechanisms.

Authors:  Aleksei V Mikhailov; Anuradha Kalyanasundaram; Ning Li; Shane S Scott; Esthela J Artiga; Megan M Subr; Jichao Zhao; Brian J Hansen; John D Hummel; Vadim V Fedorov
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.000

10.  Methodology for patient-specific modeling of atrial fibrosis as a substrate for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kathleen S McDowell; Fijoy Vadakkumpadan; Robert Blake; Joshua Blauer; Gernot Plank; Rob S MacLeod; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.