Literature DB >> 9519232

Clinical experience with fluticasone propionate in asthma: a meta-analysis of efficacy and systemic activity compared with budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate at half the microgram dose or less.

N C Barnes1, C Hallett, T A Harris.   

Abstract

The relative clinical efficacy and systemic effects of different inhaled corticosteroids is controversial. To obtain further information on this matter, the authors have performed meta-analysis of seven trials comparing fluticasone propionate (FP) with budesonide (Bud), and seven trials comparing FP with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) for the treatment of asthma of all severities in adult and paediatric patients. In all cases, the drugs were compared at clinically equivalent doses, i.e. FP was given at half (or less) the microgram dose. The total number of patients was 1980 (1000 treated with FP 200-800 micrograms day-1 and 980 with Bud 400-1600 micrograms day-1), and 1584 patients in the second analysis (780 treated with FP 200-1000 micrograms day-1 and 804 with BDP 400-2000 micrograms day-1). FP significantly improved mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) compared with Bud, with an overall difference of +11 l min-1. Analysis of serum cortisols showed no differences between FP and Bud treatment at low doses, but at higher dosages, and overall, significant differences in favour of FP were observed. In the second meta-analysis, no significant differences in PEFR were observed between FP and BDP in any of the seven individual studies or in the pooled analysis. Analysis of serum cortisols showed a similar trend to the previous analysis, however, no overall difference in serum cortisol results were seen between FP and BDP. In conclusion, the pooled analysis shows that FP at half the dose (or less) is more effective than Bud and as effective as BDP in improving PEFR; in addition, these improvements were achieved with a reduction in cortisol suppression compared with BUD and with no greater degree of cortisol suppression compared with BDP. This demonstrates, in patients with asthma, that FP has an improved efficacy to safety ratio compared with older inhaled corticosteroids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519232     DOI: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90039-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  13 in total

1.  Bioavailability of orally administered micronised fluticasone propionate.

Authors:  C Falcoz; R Oliver; J E McDowall; P Ventresca; A Bye; P T Daley-Yates
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Absorption kinetics after inhalation of fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler, Diskus and metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  C Brindley; C Falcoz; A E Mackie; A Bye
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Comparison of the systemic effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide given by dry powder inhaler in healthy and asthmatic subjects.

Authors:  T W Harrison; A Wisniewski; J Honour; A E Tattersfield
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased.

Authors:  S Senn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29

Review 5.  Inhaled fluticasone propionate. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma.

Authors:  H M Lamb; C R Culy; D Faulds
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Effect of one year treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate or beclomethasone dipropionate on bone density and bone metabolism: a randomised parallel group study in adult asthmatic subjects.

Authors:  T C Medici; E Grebski; M Häcki; P Rüegsegger; C Maden; J Efthimiou
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide administered via nebulizer: a randomized controlled trial in patients with severe persistent asthma.

Authors:  Jiangtao Lin; Ping Chen; Chuntao Liu; Jian Kang; Wei Xiao; Zhengxian Chen; Huaping Tang; Xin Du; Cindy Liu; Linda Luo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Treatment of childhood asthma: how do the available options compare?

Authors:  David Coghlan; Colin Powell
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 9.  Safety of the newer inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma.

Authors:  Tabitha L Randell; Kim C Donaghue; Geoffrey R Ambler; Christopher T Cowell; Dominic A Fitzgerald; Peter P van Asperen
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Trends in the use of inhaled corticosteroids for childhood asthma in New Zealand.

Authors:  Maria Johansson; Jason Hall; David Reith; Pam Jackson; Murray Tilyard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08-23       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.