Literature DB >> 9518138

Maturation of the tract after percutaneous cholecystostomy with regard to the access route.

A A Hatjidakis1, S Karampekios, P Prassopoulos, E Xynos, M Raissaki, S I Vasilakis, N C Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the shortest time for catheter removal with regard to the transhepatic or transperitoneal approach in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC).
METHODS: In this prospective study, 40 consecutive high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (calculous, n = 22; acalculous, n = 18) underwent PC by means of a transhepatic (n = 20) or transperitoneal (n = 20) access route. In 28 patients (70%) computed tomography was used for puncture guidance, while in the remaining 12 (30%) the procedures were formed under ultrasound control. A fistulography was performed on the 14th postprocedural day in al patients and was repeated weekly if the tract was found to be immature. The catheter was removed only if a mature tract without evidence of leakage was delineated.
RESULTS: In 36 of 40 patients the procedure was technically successful (90%). Three of the unsuccessful punctures were attempted transperitoneally and one transhepatically. Thirty-five of 36 patients showed rapid improvement within the first 48 hr following the procedure (96%). Three of them died of their severe underlying disease (7.5%) and in another three the catheter was accidentally removed prior to the first fistulography (7.5%) A total of 30 patients could be fully evaluated after the procedure: 15 with a transhepatic, and 15 with a transperitoneal PC. Whereas 14 of 15 patients (93%) with transhepatic gallbladder access developed a mature tract after 14 days and the remaining patient after 3 weeks, only 2 of 15 patients (13%) with a transperitoneal route presented a mature tract after 2 weeks (p < 0.0001; chi2 test with Yates' correction). Eleven patients (73%) with transperitoneal access required 3 weeks and two patients (13%) 4 weeks for complete tract formation.
CONCLUSION: A period of 2 weeks suffices for the majority of patients to develop a mature tract when the transhepatic access route is used; when using the transperitoneal route at least 3 weeks are required. We suggest that the transhepatic route is preferable since it allows earlier removal of the catheter and reduces the incidence of complications and discomfort for the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9518138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  11 in total

1.  Ultrasound guided percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients for surgical intervention.

Authors:  Huseyin Bakkaloglu; Hakan Yanar; Recep Guloglu; Korhan Taviloglu; Fatih Tunca; Murat Aksoy; Cemalettin Ertekin; Arzu Poyanli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Radiological interventions in malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Deep Narayan Srivastava; Arun Kumar Gupta
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 3.  Pediatric Biliary Interventions in the Native Liver.

Authors:  Lisa H Kang; Colin N Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  Gallbladder: Role of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Matthew Antalek; Ahsun Riaz; Albert A Nemcek
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 1.780

Review 5.  Image-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Shayeri Roy Choudhury; Pankaj Gupta; Shikha Garg; Naveen Kalra; Mandeep Kang; Manavjit Singh Sandhu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOCOLATE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kirsten Kortram; Bert van Ramshorst; Thomas L Bollen; Marc G H Besselink; Dirk J Gouma; Tom Karsten; Philip M Kruyt; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Johannes C Kelder; Ellen Tromp; Djamila Boerma
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Feasibility of conversion of percutaneous cholecystostomy to internal transmural endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage.

Authors:  Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri; Saburo Matsubara; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Naminatsu Takahara; Suguru Mizuno; Hirofumi Kogure; Ryunosuke Hakuta; Yukiko Ito; Minoru Tada; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

8.  Delayed bilhemia complicating percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: Successful treatment with primary coil embolization.

Authors:  Mehmet Semih Çakır; Tevfik Guzelbey; Erdem Kınacı; Mert Mahsuni Sevinc; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2018-11-27

9.  Cholecystostomy as Bridge to Surgery and as Definitive Treatment or Acute Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Popowicz; Lars Lundell; Peter Gerber; Ulf Gustafsson; Emil Pieniowski; Helen Sinabulya; Krister Sjödahl; Andrianos Tsekrekos; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Safety and Efficacy of Early Tube Removal Following Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Hidehiro Kamezaki; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Kenji Shimura; Dai Sakamoto; Junichi Senoo; Hideaki Mizumoto; Michio Kubota; Yu Yoshida; Ryosaku Azemoto; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Naoya Kato
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.