Literature DB >> 9517693

Reduction of "callbacks" to the ED due to discrepancies in plain radiograph interpretation.

C A Preston1, J J Marr, K K Amaraneni, B S Suthar.   

Abstract

Retrospective and prospective chart review was conducted to study patient callbacks to the emergency department (ED) based on plain radiograph interpretation discrepancies between radiologists and emergency physicians before and after a continuous quality improvement (CQI) intervention. Patients who were called back to the ED because of radiograph interpretation discrepancies were retrospectively studied. These results were reviewed by a CQI team, which recommended greater communication and consultation. A prospective study was then performed. Before quality intervention, 0.7% of the patients were recalled; 0.4% required recall after quality assurance, a reduction of 42.9% (P = .0001). Emergency physicians in this study had a low percentage of patient recall due to discrepancies in radiologic interpretation. CQI further reduced this percentage. The proficiency of emergency physicians interpreting radiographs validates the current practice of emergency physicians rendering treatment based on their interpretations and supports the notion of emergency physicians billing for this service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9517693     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(98)90036-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  8 in total

1.  Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study.

Authors:  J A Espinosa; T W Nolan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Chest radiographs in the emergency department: is the radiologist really necessary?

Authors:  M E Gatt; G Spectre; O Paltiel; N Hiller; R Stalnikowicz
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation by emergency physicians.

Authors:  Zohair Al aseri
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-09-09

4.  Trauma rapid review process: efficient out-patient fracture management.

Authors:  A Beiri; A Alani; T Ibrahim; G J S Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Establishing the evidence base for trauma quality improvement: a collaborative WHO-IATSIC review.

Authors:  Catherine J Juillard; Charles Mock; Jacques Goosen; Manjul Joshipura; Ian Civil
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Radiograph Interpretation Discrepancies in a Community Hospital Emergency Department.

Authors:  Michael J Tranovich; Christopher M Gooch; Joseph M Dougherty
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-02

Review 7.  Applications of artificial intelligence in the thorax: a narrative review focusing on thoracic radiology.

Authors:  Yisak Kim; Ji Yoon Park; Eui Jin Hwang; Sang Min Lee; Chang Min Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Reimbursement for emergency department electrocardiography and radiograph interpretations: what is it worth for the emergency physician.

Authors:  Tina Wu; Mark R Bell; James R Blakeman; Irv Edwards; William K Mallon
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.