Literature DB >> 9517503

Intensified induction chemotherapy with high dose cytarabine and etoposide for acute myeloid leukemia: a review and updated results of the Australian Leukemia Study Group.

J F Bishop1, J P Matthews, G A Young, K Bradstock, R M Lowenthal.   

Abstract

Induction therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with standard dose chemotherapy will result in approximately 55-75% of patients achieving a complete remission (CR). Intensification of induction treatment with etoposide and high dose cytarabine does not alter the CR rate but appears to significantly improve the subsequent outcome. Updated results of the comparison of high dose cytarabine with daunorubicin and etoposide in induction (HIDAC-3-7) versus a standard dose combination (7-3-7) demonstrated a highly significant increase in relapse free survival, (RFS) on the high dose arm (p = 0.007) with RFS of 48% at 5 years with HIDAC-3-7 and 25% on 7-3-7. The high dose arm had a more modest survival advantage at 5 years of 33% compared with 25% on standard treatment, possibly because of a higher initial death rate with HIDAC-3-7. The improvement seen in patients with CR after high dose induction appear to parallel results obtained with post-remission therapies intensified with high dose cytarabine. These studies provide clinical evidence that a dose-response effect is present for cytarabine in AML. Intensified treatment is more toxic, gives more profound myelosuppression post-remission and has been shown to benefit younger patients only. Issues of patient selection and the optimal placement of intensification in the treatment sequence require further study. In the future, it is likely that remission duration may be a useful clinical tool to study the influence of new induction therapies on residual resistant leukemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9517503     DOI: 10.3109/10428199809092687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  13 in total

1.  Elucidation and Pharmacological Targeting of Novel Molecular Drivers of Follicular Lymphoma Progression.

Authors:  Brygida Bisikirska; Mukesh Bansal; Yao Shen; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Raju Chaganti; Andrea Califano
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Benefit of high-dose daunorubicin in AML induction extends across cytogenetic and molecular groups.

Authors:  Marlise R Luskin; Ju-Whei Lee; Hugo F Fernandez; Omar Abdel-Wahab; John M Bennett; Rhett P Ketterling; Hillard M Lazarus; Ross L Levine; Mark R Litzow; Elisabeth M Paietta; Jay P Patel; Janis Racevskis; Jacob M Rowe; Martin S Tallman; Zhuoxin Sun; Selina M Luger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Randomized use of cyclosporin A (CsA) to modulate P-glycoprotein in children with AML in remission: Pediatric Oncology Group Study 9421.

Authors:  David Becton; Gary V Dahl; Yaddanapudi Ravindranath; Myron N Chang; Fred G Behm; Susana C Raimondi; David R Head; Kimo C Stine; Norman J Lacayo; Branimir Ivan Sikic; Robert J Arceci; Howard Weinstein
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  In vivo use of all-trans retinoic acid prior to induction chemotherapy improves complete remission rate and increases rhodamine 123 uptake in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  C Ustün; M Beksac; K Dalva; H Koc; N Konuk; O Ilhan; M Ozcan; P Topcuoglu; D Sertkaya; M Hayran
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes; Stefan Faderl; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Elias Jabbour; William Wierda; Tapan Kadia; Sherry Pierce; Jianqin Shan; Michael Keating; Emil J Freireich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Anthracycline dose intensification in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hugo F Fernandez; Zhuoxin Sun; Xiaopan Yao; Mark R Litzow; Selina M Luger; Elisabeth M Paietta; Janis Racevskis; Gordon W Dewald; Rhett P Ketterling; John M Bennett; Jacob M Rowe; Hillard M Lazarus; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Acute myeloid leukemia in adults.

Authors:  L D Cripe; S Hinton
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-04

8.  Daunorubicin versus mitoxantrone versus idarubicin as induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute myeloid leukemia: the EORTC and GIMEMA Groups Study AML-10.

Authors:  Franco Mandelli; Marco Vignetti; Stefan Suciu; Roberto Stasi; Maria-Concetta Petti; Giovanna Meloni; Petra Muus; Filippo Marmont; Jean-Pierre Marie; Boris Labar; Xavier Thomas; Francesco Di Raimondo; Roel Willemze; Vincenzo Liso; Felicetto Ferrara; Liliana Baila; Paola Fazi; Robert Zittoun; Sergio Amadori; Theo de Witte
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A multicenter trial of myeloablative clofarabine and busulfan conditioning for relapsed or primary induction failure AML not in remission at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  J Magenau; P Westervelt; S Khaled; J McGuirk; P Hari; M Eapen; P S Becker; B Parkin; T Braun; B Logan; H Wang; M Jagasia; S D Rowley; D D H Kim; T Schechter; N Frey; B Scott; T Churay; S Lieland; S Forman; S Mineishi
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Novel homobarringtonie-containing therapy for the treatment of patients with primary acute myeloid leukemia that are resistant to conventional therapy.

Authors:  Jingsong He; Li Li; Jingjing Zhu; Weiyan Zheng; Wenjun Wu; Yanlong Zheng; Xiujin Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.