Literature DB >> 9516218

Body composition by air-displacement plethysmography by using predicted and measured thoracic gas volumes.

M A McCrory1, P A Molé, T D Gomez, K G Dewey, E M Bernauer.   

Abstract

The BOD POD, a new air-displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body composition, utilizes the inverse relationship between pressure and volume (Boyle's law) to measure body volume directly. The quantity of air in the lungs during tidal breathing, the average thoracic gas volume (Vtg), is also measured by the BOD POD by using a standard plethysmographic technique. Alternatively, the BOD POD provides the use of a predicted Vtg (Vtgpred). The validity of using Vtgpred in place of measured Vtg (Vtgmeas) to determine the percentage of body fat (%BF) was evaluated in 50 subjects (36 women, 14 men; ages 18-56 yr). There was no significant difference between Vtgmeas and Vtgpred (mean difference +/- SE, 53.5 +/- 63.3 ml) nor in %BF by using Vtgmeas vs. Vtgpred (0.2 +/- 0.2 %BF). On an individual basis, %BF measured by using Vtgmeas vs. Vtgpred differed within +/-2.0% BF for 82% of the subjects; maximum differences were -2.9 to +3.0% BF. For comparison, data from 24 subjects who had undergone hydrostatic weighing were evaluated for the validity of using predicted vs. measured residual lung volume (VRpred vs. VRmeas, respectively). Differences between VRmeas and VRpred and in %BF calculated by using VRmeas vs. VRpred were significant (187 +/- 46 ml and 1.4 +/- 0.3% BF, respectively; P < 0.001). On an individual basis, %BF determined by using VRmeas vs. VRpred differed within +/-2.0% BF for 46% of the subjects; maximum differences were -2.9 to +3.8% BF. With respect to %BF measured by air displacement, our findings support the use of Vtgpred for group mean comparisons and for purposes such as screening in young to middle-aged individuals. This contrasts with the use of VRpred in hydrostatic weighing, which leads to significant errors in the estimation of %BF. Furthermore, although the use of Vtgpred has some application, determining Vtgmeas is relatively simple in most cases. Therefore, we recommend that the use of Vtgmeas remain as standard experimental and clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9516218     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.4.1475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  28 in total

1.  Whole body air displacement plethysmography compared with hydrodensitometry for body composition analysis.

Authors:  O Dewit; N J Fuller; M S Fewtrell; M Elia; J C Wells
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Consistency of a mobile body composition trailer: a novel portable laboratory assessment?

Authors:  Gena R Gerstner; Eric D Ryan; Craig R Kleinberg; Andrew J Tweedell; Abbie E Smith-Ryan
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.273

3.  Accuracy of six anthropometric skinfold formulas versus air displacement plethysmography for estimating percent body fat in female adolescents with phenylketonuria.

Authors:  Teresa D Douglas; Mary J Kennedy; Meghan E Quirk; Sarah H Yi; Rani H Singh
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2012-12-29

4.  Validity of weight loss to estimate improvement in body composition in individuals attending a wellness center.

Authors:  Paulina Cruz; Bruce D Johnson; Susan C Karpinski; Katherine A Limoges; Beth A Warren; Kerry D Olsen; Virend K Somers; Michael D Jensen; Matthew M Clark; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Utility of ultrasound for body fat assessment: validity and reliability compared to a multicompartment criterion.

Authors:  Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Malia N M Blue; Eric T Trexler; Katie R Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.273

6.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based body volume measurement for 4-compartment body composition.

Authors:  Joseph P Wilson; Kathleen Mulligan; Bo Fan; Jennifer L Sherman; Elizabeth J Murphy; Viva W Tai; Cassidy L Powers; Lorena Marquez; Viviana Ruiz-Barros; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Validity and reliability of a 4-compartment body composition model using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived body volume.

Authors:  Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Meredith G Mock; Eric D Ryan; Gena R Gerstner; Eric T Trexler; Katie R Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  Comparison of body adiposity index (BAI) and air displacement plethysmograph with estimations of % body fat in adults with Down's syndrome.

Authors:  M Rossato; R A Dellagrana; E de Souza Bezerra; R M da Costa; J O L Dos Santos; D A S Silva; F Diefenthaeler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight/obese women.

Authors:  Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Eric T Trexler; Hailee L Wingfield; Malia N M Blue
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Use of air displacement plethysmography in the determination of percentage of fat mass in african american children.

Authors:  Andrea C Buchholz; Karen M Majchrzak; Kong Y Chen; Sadhna M Shankar; Maciej S Buchowski
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.