Literature DB >> 9515850

Factors predictive of survival among 337 patients with mesothelioma treated between 1984 and 1994 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

J E Herndon1, M R Green, A P Chahinian, J M Corson, Y Suzuki, N J Vogelzang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the individual and joint effect of various pretreatment clinical characteristics on the survival of patients with mesothelioma treated by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1984 and September 1994, 337 patients with malignant mesothelioma and no prior chemotherapy were accrued to seven phase II studies conducted by the CALGB which screened the efficacy of 10 treatment regimens or dose levels. The eligibility criteria for all studies were virtually identical. Patient characteristics include the following: age older than 60 years (63%); male (83%); performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 (81%); chest pain (60%); definite asbestos exposure (62%); >5% weight loss (41%); and pleural involvement (94%). Median survival time (MST) for the 10 treatment regimens ranged from 3.9 to 9.8 months (overall=7.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 8.3), with 1-year survival between 14% and 50% (overall=27%; 95% CI, 23 to 33%).
RESULTS: Cox survival models and exponential regression trees were used to examine the prognostic importance of pretreatment patient characteristics. Univariate analyses show that patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS, chest pain, dyspnea, platelet count (PLT) >400,000/microL, weight loss, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level >500 IU/L, pleural involvement, low hemoglobin (HGB) level, high WBC count, and increasing age over 75 years have a worse prognosis. With decreasing risk ratio, multivariate Cox analyses showed that pleural involvement, LDH >500 IU/L, poor PS, chest pain, PLT >400,000/microL, nonepithelial histology, and increasing age older than 75 years jointly predict poor survival. PS was the most important prognostic split in the regression tree. Terminal nodes were amalgamated to form six distinct prognostic subgroups with MST (2-year survival) of 13.9 (38%) in 36 patients, 9.5 (21%) in 36 patients, 9.2 (10%) in 146 patients, 6.5 (3%) in 33 patients, 4.4 (0%) in 73 patients, and 1.4 (0%) in 13 patients (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The subgroup with the best survival (MST=13.9 months) included patients with PS=0 and age younger than 49 years, and patients with PS=0, age of 49 years or older, and HGB > or =14.6. The worst survival (MST= 1.4 months) occurred for patients with PS= 1/2 and WBC > or =15.6/microL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9515850     DOI: 10.1378/chest.113.3.723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  108 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for malignant mesothelioma in 142 patients: validation of CALGB and EORTC prognostic scoring systems.

Authors:  J G Edwards; K R Abrams; J N Leverment; T J Spyt; D A Waller; K J O'Byrne
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin plus bevacizumab or placebo in patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  Hedy L Kindler; Theodore G Karrison; David R Gandara; Charles Lu; Lee M Krug; James P Stevenson; Pasi A Jänne; David I Quinn; Marianna N Koczywas; Julie R Brahmer; Kathy S Albain; David A Taber; Samuel G Armato; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Helen X Chen; Walter M Stadler; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Multicentric study on malignant pleural mesothelioma in Turkey: clinicopathologic and survival characteristics of 282 patients.

Authors:  Emin Tamer Elkiran; Mehmet Ali Kaplan; Alper Sevinc; Sercan Aksoy; Umut Demirci; Mesut Seker; Hakan Harputluoglu; Nuriye Yildirim Ozdemir; Feridun Isik; Arife Ulas; Mevlude Inanc; Ulku Yalcintas Arslan; Gamze Gokoz Dogu; Abdurrahman Isikdogan; Suleyman Buyukberber
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Brain metastases in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Tomoko Yamagishi; Nobukazu Fujimoto; Yosuke Miyamoto; Michiko Asano; Yasuko Fuchimoto; Sae Wada; Kenichi Kitamura; Shinji Ozaki; Hideyuki Nishi; Takumi Kishimoto
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  [Guidelines of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma].

Authors:  A Scherpereel; P Astoul; P Baas; T Berghmans; H Clayson; P de Vuyst; H Dienemann; F Galateau-Salle; C Hennequin; G Hillerdal; C Le Pe'choux; L Mutti; J-C Pairon; R Stahel; P van Houtte; J van Meerbeeck; D Waller; W Weder
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2010-10

6.  Which type of surgery should become the preferred procedure for malignant pleural mesothelioma: extrapleural pneumonectomy or extended pleurectomy?

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Bedirhan; Levent Cansever; Adalet Demir; Süleyman Ceyhan; Hasan Akın; Halide Nur Urer; Aysun Olçmen; Celalettin Kocatürk; Ibrahim Dinçer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: have we identified the appropriate selection tools?

Authors:  Nico van Zandwijk; Glen Reid; Anthony Linton; Steven Kao
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

8.  Biomarkers and prognostic factors for mesothelioma.

Authors:  Harvey I Pass
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

9.  MiR-score: a novel 6-microRNA signature that predicts survival outcomes in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Michaela B Kirschner; Yuen Yee Cheng; Nicola J Armstrong; Ruby C Y Lin; Steven C Kao; Anthony Linton; Sonja Klebe; Brian C McCaughan; Nico van Zandwijk; Glen Reid
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Prognostic significance of p16/cdkn2a loss in pleural malignant mesotheliomas.

Authors:  Sanja Dacic; Hannelore Kothmaier; Stephanie Land; Yongli Shuai; Iris Halbwedl; Patrizia Morbini; Bruno Murer; Camilla Comin; Françoise Galateau-Salle; Funda Demirag; Handan Zeren; Richard Attanoos; Alan Gibbs; Philip Cagle; Helmut Popper
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.