OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the reliability and validity of a new version of the University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ), a 24-item measure that assesses self-reported shortness of breath while performing a variety of activities of daily living. DESIGN: PATIENTS enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program were asked to complete the SOBQ, the Quality of Well-Being Scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and a 6-min walk with modified Borg scale ratings of perceived breathlessness following the walk. SETTING: University medical center pulmonary rehabilitation program. PATIENTS: Thirty-two male subjects and 22 female subjects with a variety of pulmonary diagnoses: COPD (n=28), cystic fibrosis (n=9), and postlung transplant (n=17). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The current version of the SOBQ was compared with the previous version, the format of which often resulted in a significant number of "not applicable" answers. The results demonstrated that the SOBQ had excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.96). The SOBQ was also significantly correlated with all validity criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The SOBQ is a valuable assessment tool in both clinical practice and research in patients with moderate-to-severe lung disease.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the reliability and validity of a new version of the University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ), a 24-item measure that assesses self-reported shortness of breath while performing a variety of activities of daily living. DESIGN:PATIENTS enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program were asked to complete the SOBQ, the Quality of Well-Being Scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and a 6-min walk with modified Borg scale ratings of perceived breathlessness following the walk. SETTING: University medical center pulmonary rehabilitation program. PATIENTS: Thirty-two male subjects and 22 female subjects with a variety of pulmonary diagnoses: COPD (n=28), cystic fibrosis (n=9), and postlung transplant (n=17). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The current version of the SOBQ was compared with the previous version, the format of which often resulted in a significant number of "not applicable" answers. The results demonstrated that the SOBQ had excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.96). The SOBQ was also significantly correlated with all validity criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The SOBQ is a valuable assessment tool in both clinical practice and research in patients with moderate-to-severe lung disease.
Authors: Xavier Soler; Eduardo Gaio; Frank L Powell; Joe W Ramsdell; Jose S Loredo; Atul Malhotra; Andrew L Ries Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-08
Authors: Jungeun Lee; Huong Q Nguyen; Monica E Jarrett; Pamela H Mitchell; Kenneth C Pike; Vincent S Fan Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 2.210