Literature DB >> 9515758

Extracolonic manifestations of familial adenomatous polyposis: desmoid tumours, and upper gastrointestinal adenomas and carcinomas.

G Griffioen1, P J Bus, H F Vasen, H W Verspaget, C B Lamers.   

Abstract

It is well known that patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at considerable risk of developing extracolonic manifestations of the disease. Particularly, desmoid tumours of the abdominal cavity, and duodenal adenomas and carcinomas are the most serious ones. It is estimated that some 10% of the FAP patients will develop desmoids, whereas 50-90% of the FAP patients will get duodenal adenomas predominantly concentrated on or around the major papilla. Desmoid tumours and duodenal carcinomas are major causes of death in those patients in whom a prophylactic (procto)colectomy has been performed. Desmoids are histologically benign tumours, composed of mature fibroblasts. They usually grow slowly but they can become quite large and may compress or infiltrate surrounding viscera, which might cause significant morbidity as well as mortality. Successful treatment of these tumours is extremely difficult as surgical therapy often requires the removal of considerable lengths of small bowel. Moreover, surgical therapy may lead to uncontrollable bleeding and is seldom radical. Chemotherapy with cytoxic agents seems promising but so far the data are too few for firm conclusions to be drawn. The same holds true for drug regimens which interfere with the metabolic and hormonal metabolism of the tumour. Although various lines of evidence suggest that the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, which is generally accepted for colorectal adenomas, also applies for the duodenal adenomas in FAP patients, it is not clear whether we should screen these patients for upper gastrointestinal adenomas or not. As these polyps are usually small, sessile, multiple and difficult to remove, the benefit of endoscopic surveillance would be the early detection of cancer rather than eradication of the polyps. In addition, evidence that screening and early treatment leads to improvement of the prognosis is not available. Although the role of (procto)colectomy in the treatment of large-bowel polyps is well established in FAP patients, the treatment of their duodenal counterparts is still open for debate. The risk of the development of periampullary cancer is not high enough to warrant an aggressive prophylactic surgical approach, i.e. a Whipple's procedure, immediately after the discovery of duodenal adenomas. The considerable morbidity and mortality rates of this procedure must be weighted against a putative benefit of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9515758     DOI: 10.1080/003655298750027281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl        ISSN: 0085-5928


  5 in total

1.  Familial adenomatous polyposis in China.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Qing Wei Liu; Liang Wen Li; Qiang Zhi Wang; Min Hong; Jian Dong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Surveillance and management of upper gastrointestinal disease in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  Michelle C Gallagher; Robin K S Phillips; Steffen Bulow
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  [Technique of pancreas-preserving duodenectomy].

Authors:  J Köninger; H Friess; M Wagner; M Kadmon; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Progression of duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis: due to ageing of subjects and advances in technology.

Authors:  Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen; Karam S Boparai; Evelien Dekker; Nan van Geloven
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Slow progression of periampullary neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Kouros L Moozar; Lisa Madlensky; Terri Berk; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.