Literature DB >> 9515079

Aquatic toxicity testing of sparingly soluble, volatile, and unstable substances and interpretation and use of data. Task Force of the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals.

H Rufli1, P R Fisk, A E Girling, J M King, R Länge, X Lejeune, N Stelter, C Stevens, P Suteau, J Tapp, J Thus, D J Versteeg, H J Niessen.   

Abstract

Aquatic toxicity tests were originally designed for individual compounds that are soluble and stable in water. For sparingly soluble substances that are not toxic at the solubility limit, the issue is whether tests should be performed with insoluble test substance present. Based on a literature evaluation of the physiology of uptake, it was concluded that only the dissolved fraction is available for uptake and that the insoluble test substance may introduce artifacts that aggravate data interpretation. Therefore, toxicity tests should be conducted only up to the solubility limit. Testing of volatile, unstable, or adsorptive substances is complicated by the ability to keep exposure concentrations relatively constant. For these, appropriate test protocols including adequate design of the dosing systems must be employed. For test medium preparation, physical methods and, where necessary, use of low concentrations of certain solvents are recommended to support handling and speed of dissolution. However, recommendation is made against the use of dispersants. Water-accommodated fractions are recommended as one approach for dosing multicomponent substances. Interpretation of observed effects depends on appropriate test medium preparation, correct measurement and expression of exposure levels, and differentiation of true toxicity from indirect physical effects of the substance, or the toxicity of impurities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9515079     DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1997.1612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  5 in total

1.  The scientific evaluation of the hazards of marine bulk liquid transport.

Authors:  T Höfer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Toxicity of hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls (HO-PCBs) using the bioluminescent assay Microtox(®).

Authors:  Renu Bhalla; Rouzbeh Tehrani; Benoit Van Aken
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Sub-lethal effects of acetone on Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Barbara Leoni; Roberta Bettinetti; Silvana Galassi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Chemical fate and biological effects of several endocrine disrupters compounds in two echinoderm species.

Authors:  Michela Sugni; Paolo Tremolada; Cinta Porte; Alice Barbaglio; Francesco Bonasoro; M Daniela Candia Carnevali
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Initial in vitro screening approach to investigate the potential health and environmental hazards of Enviroxtrade mark - a nanoparticulate cerium oxide diesel fuel additive.

Authors:  Barry Park; Patricia Martin; Chris Harris; Robert Guest; Andrew Whittingham; Peter Jenkinson; John Handley
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 9.400

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.