Literature DB >> 9514562

Temporal and qualitative properties of cold pain and heat pain: a psychophysical study.

C Morin1, C M Bushnell.   

Abstract

Dorsal horn neurons that respond to noxious cold also respond to noxious heat, suggesting the hypothesis that pain evoked by temperature extremes, whether hot or cold, may be processed similarly in the CNS. In this study, we tested perceptual consequences of this hypothesis by comparing characteristics of heat and cold pain, as well as of innocuous warm and cool. Eight healthy subjects performed psychophysical tasks involving hot and cold cutaneous stimuli. Using a 9-cm2 contact thermode, temperatures from -5 degrees to 48 degrees C were each applied for 30 s to the thenar eminence. Subjects gave continuous ratings of perceived temperature and pain intensity, using an electronic VAS. After each stimulus, subjects also reported the maximum stimulus intensity and unpleasantness, and chose appropriate words from a list of qualitative verbal descriptors. We found that larger temperature differences were needed in the noxious cold than in the noxious heat range to produce equal perceptual differences. Further, in the heat range, stimulus-response functions were steeper for noxious than for innocuous temperatures, whereas in the cold range, the opposite held true. The relative unpleasantness of heat pain did not differ from that of cold pain, but subjects used a wider range of qualitative words to describe cold pain. Perceived stimulus intensity was compared to temperature recordings from intradermal and skin surface thermocouples. Heat pain, cool and warmth appeared to depend on surface temperature, whereas cold pain was related to subcutaneous temperature, suggesting different receptors for noxious heat and noxious cold. These data, combined with results of human brain imaging and primate electrophysiological studies, suggest that the unpleasantness associated with both heat pain and cold pain is processed similarly in the CNS, whereas differential information about stimulus quality is preserved in the cerebral cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9514562     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00152-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  30 in total

Review 1.  Temperature sensing across species.

Authors:  David D McKemy
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 2.  Converting cold into pain.

Authors:  Carlos Belmonte; James A Brock; Felix Viana
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Critical role of the pore domain in the cold response of TRPM8 channels identified by ortholog functional comparison.

Authors:  María Pertusa; Bastián Rivera; Alejandro González; Gonzalo Ugarte; Rodolfo Madrid
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Scraping through the ice: uncovering the role of TRPM8 in cold transduction.

Authors:  Daniel D McCoy; Wendy M Knowlton; David D McKemy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 5.  The molecular and cellular basis of cold sensation.

Authors:  David D McKemy
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.418

6.  Sustained Morphine Administration Induces TRPM8-Dependent Cold Hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Kerui Gong; Luc Jasmin
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Mouse Parabrachial Neurons Signal a Relationship between Bitter Taste and Nociceptive Stimuli.

Authors:  Jinrong Li; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Molecular basis of peripheral innocuous cold sensitivity.

Authors:  David D McKemy
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

9.  Diversity in the neural circuitry of cold sensing revealed by genetic axonal labeling of transient receptor potential melastatin 8 neurons.

Authors:  Yoshio Takashima; Richard L Daniels; Wendy Knowlton; James Teng; Emily R Liman; David D McKemy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Non-CB1, non-CB2 receptors for endocannabinoids, plant cannabinoids, and synthetic cannabimimetics: focus on G-protein-coupled receptors and transient receptor potential channels.

Authors:  Luciano De Petrocellis; Vincenzo Di Marzo
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.