Literature DB >> 9514436

Nifedipine and verapamil inhibit the sigmoid colon myoelectric response to eating in healthy volunteers.

G Bassotti1, C Calcara, V Annese, S Fiorella, P Roselli, A Morelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Constipation is not an infrequent side effect complained of by patients taking calcium channel blockers. This effect may reduce patients' compliance and yield potentially serious consequences. However, the underlying mechanisms for constipation caused by such compounds are not known. AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of nifedipine and verapamil on the sigmoid myoelectric response to eating, a physiologic test of colonic motor function. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nine healthy male volunteers with no previous abdominal surgery were recruited for the study and underwent three paired studies at two-week intervals. Myoelectric sigmoid activity was recorded by means of two clip electrodes introduced within the viscus without preparation for 30 minutes basally and 90 minutes postprandially. Each study was preceded by placebo, nifedipine (20 mg), or verapamil (120 mg).
RESULTS: Analysis of the tracings revealed that nifedipine strongly inhibited the sigmoid myoelectric response to the meal. This response was also significantly reduced in those taking verapamil compared with the placebo group, although to a much lesser extent than in those taking nifedipine.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that constipation as a result of some calcium channel blockers may be caused by inhibition of colonic motor activity by nifedipine and, to a lesser extent, by verapamil. The latter compound probably displays other mechanisms (reduced colonic transit, increased water absorption) also responsible for this side effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9514436     DOI: 10.1007/bf02237495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

1.  Do calcium channel blockers and antimuscarinics protect against perforated colonic diverticular disease? A case control study.

Authors:  C R Morris; I M Harvey; W S L Stebbings; C T M Speakman; H J Kennedy; A R Hart
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Effect of nifedipine on anorectal sensorimotor functions in health and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Jessica Edge; Alan R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  Drug-induced gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  H L Philpott; S Nandurkar; J Lubel; P R Gibson
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-19

4.  Perforated colonic diverticular disease: the importance of NSAIDs, opioids, corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers.

Authors:  Kristoffer Piekarek; Leif A Israelsson
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Recent advances in diverticular disease.

Authors:  John Simpson
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-10

Review 6.  Medical influences, surgical outcomes: role of common medications on the risk of perforation from untreated diverticular disease.

Authors:  Gianpiero Gravante; Shuker Yahia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Aging and intestinal motility: a review of factors that affect intestinal motility in the aged.

Authors:  Denis O'Mahony; Paula O'Leary; Eamonn M M Quigley
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Disorders of gastrointestinal hypomotility.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt; Ashok Tuteja; Salman Nusrat
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-08-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.