Literature DB >> 9514235

Carotid endarterectomy: the mandate for high quality duplex.

J R Elmore1, D P Franklin, D D Thomas, J R Youkey.   

Abstract

Excellent correlation between carotid angiography and duplex scanning has made it possible to perform carotid endarterectomy without angiography. The accuracy of scans from practices without a dedicated vascular laboratory must be validated prior to their use for clinical decisions. Seventy six patients had a carotid duplex performed at an outside institution and were referred for vascular surgery. All patients underwent a repeat study at our dedicated vascular lab. The overall accuracy of our lab was 93.8% for all carotid categories as demonstrated by angiography. Outside carotid duplex reports correlated with repeat exams as follows: occlusions: 10/13 carotids (76.9%); 80%-99% stenoses: 15/39 carotids (38.5%); 50%-79% stenoses: 28/44 carotids (63.6%). If a surgeon's practice is to operate for asymptomatic 80%-99% stenoses by report, then unnecessary surgery might have been performed in 61.5% of these carotids and appropriate surgery denied in 3.6%. Outside duplex velocities consistent with a 60%-99% stenosis correlated in 13/17 carotids (76.5%). If a surgeon's practice is to operate for asymptomatic 60%-99% stenoses based on velocity criteria, then unnecessary surgery might have been performed in 23.5% of these carotids, and appropriate surgery denied in 7.6% placing these patients at increased risk of stroke. Outside scans significantly overestimated the severity of carotid disease (p = 0.003). The weighted kappa analysis for agreement between scans was only 60.2%. Failure to have validated high-quality duplex in labs performing carotid studies can lead to unnecessary angiography or surgery. Carotid endarterectomy without angiography should be performed only when duplex accuracy has been previously validated by angiographic correlation studies. Poor agreement with studies from practices without a dedicated vascular lab makes it mandatory to repeat the duplex on all patients prior to clinical decision making. Reimbursement for such repeat studies should not be denied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9514235     DOI: 10.1007/s100169900134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based cardiology: Prevention of ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  H J Barnett; M Eliasziw; H E Meldrum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-05

2.  [Diagnostic evaluation of carotid artery stenoses with multislice CT angiography. Review of the literature and results of a pilot study].

Authors:  B Ertl-Wagner; R Brüning; R-T Hoffmann; G Meimarakis; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

4.  Poor agreement in carotid artery stenosis detection by ultrasound between external offices and a vascular center.

Authors:  Georgiana-Aura Giurgea; Ilda Lilaj; Michael E Gschwandtner; Christian Margeta; Sonja Zehetmayer; Christoph Domenig; Oliver Schlager; Michael Schwameis; Renate Koppensteiner; Andrea Willfort-Ehringer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.704

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.